Pratfall after the substitution

[Serge Manjukhin]

That's obviously not illegal

Sorry, you mean I (a manager of my club) can not change the formation of my team during the match? So, if i started with 4-1-2-1-2, then I have to finish with the same??????

I think, even it is illegal to change the formation, so I have the one player with not his position, so, ok, let's imagine I have no more this player this way - I have only the 10 players. Even in this case it wouldn't make me 20%.

[Croft Original]

Sorry, you mean I (a manager of my club) can not change the formation of my team during the match? So, if i started with 4-1-2-1-2, then I have to finish with the same??????

I think, even it is illegal to change the formation, so I have the one player with not his position, so, ok, let's imagine I have no more this player this way - I have only the 10 players. Even in this case it wouldn't make me 20%.

No. I first thought you played a player out of position causing an illegal formation giving you 20% possession, but after your explanation for your substitution I said that you were NOT illegal & couldn't explain why you ended up with 20%