Scouting system is flawed

[Izo Sehway]

You know the scout that comes back to you off and says he's found some players the he thinks could improve the squad. This is VERY FLAWED. IT IS NOT RANDOM AT ALL. Since this update was introduced all he's every brought me a 3 strikers regardless of me already having 3 strikers already he still continues to bring me strikers...This is sooooo flawed and annoying I don't even see the point of this feature if you can't tell him what positions to scout for.

[Tactician]

Hahaha. The more 'funny' thing in there is when say recommendations for a particular position were out on a day, and this was the day that one or more of your main players in that particular position had performed badly or strangely compared to how he/they used to perform.

Coincidence?

For me, this has happened at least twice so far (but I was not keeping an eye on it before, so it could have happened more times).

[Bunzo]

For a while there one of my teams was recommended AML/ ST for about 6 weeks or so in a row. However the last month that has changed and I have been recommended a good variety of players . My second team has had a vey varied selection from the start… MC,ML,DC,DR,DMC,AMC,AMR ,ST & GK.
So far I have not noticed any link to players performance & recommended offers.

[Tactician]

For a while there one of my teams was recommended AML/ ST for about 6 weeks or so in a row. However the last month that has changed and I have been recommended a good variety of players . My second team has had a vey varied selection from the start… MC,ML,DC,DR,DMC,AMC,AMR ,ST & GK.
So far I have not noticed any link to players performance & recommended offers.

Might be a coincidence.

For my case, it was for GK (both times; that is, my 6 star GK in my team performed badly on those days that the recommendations were for GKs, and also a day before, and the assistant manager also mentioned bad things about my main GK in the match reports).

But, do also take into account what some users reported earlier, where STs were not scoring or not scoring enough goals.

Also, take into account that you have a relatively overpowered team. You might have missed some rare, individual poor performances as it probably did not affect the overall performance of team significantly. Just keep an eye on it. The more observation data we get, the better it is to make a proper conclusion.

[Bunzo]

Paul Seltzer recommended goalie from last season very steady stats so far

[Tactician]

Don't get fooled by the 8s. Even a GK that makes nothing significant in a match, for instance no saves, gets an 8 (7.4-7.6). The rating system for the GK is flawed in this game.

[Graeme Mckenzie]

I think you're maybe taking this game a little too seriously ....it's a game. Doesn't matter what you do unless you're paying for it.
Please tell me you're not paying for it