I played a illegal formation in 1 game 0-0 score but i had 64% possession on away field. I did´t not see the game either.
Attachment 21280Attachment 21281 Attachment 21282
Printable View
I played a illegal formation in 1 game 0-0 score but i had 64% possession on away field. I did´t not see the game either.
Attachment 21280Attachment 21281 Attachment 21282
Is 3dc-3mc-1amc-3st illiegal formation?
yup it is... ;)
Quote:
At least 1, but no more than 2, players on EACH outside flank. {the DL/DR, DML/DMR, ML/MR, AML/AMR slots}
Unfreaking Beleivable
Can anyone anywhere please explain how I managed to loose my Cup quarter finals game to a weaker team by almost 3 stars
and with a TOTALLY ILLEGAL FORMATION he had 2 dcs, dml, dmr, 3mcs, aml, amr, and a striker! The crazy thing is that
this guy was at the game and played the whole game with that formation then won 4-2!!!!@#$#$
The only logical explanation is that I am Canadian after 16 seasons of putting up with this kind of ludicrous ch_ _, I am speaking out.
I pay to play around $200. a month and all I would like is that they play fair!!!
Absolutly DISCUSTED!
...and where is the "illegal formation"?..He played a 4-3N-2W-1..that's all!
QUOTE=Bubba;252679]...and where is the "illegal formation"?..He played a 4-3N-2W-1..that's all![/QUOTE]
C'mon Bubba
*2 dcs, dml, dmr, 3mcs, aml, amr, and a striker!
Is not a 4-3-2-1 formation, or any other formation!
My team possesed the ball 80% of that game!
And he tried it the next day and lost 3-0...
:o...you're right...read dml/r as dl/r, my fault! Also, if you got 80% possession there's no doubt about it!
I don't get it... When you say a formation is illegal, is it because it gives the team an unfair advantage or something? Cause I read that illegal formations result on a 20% possetion or something and nothing more at some cases.. Still I believe that if it's not a bug or something any kind of formation that can be played real life football, can be played on Top Eleven. Remember catenacio..
The game treats some formations as illegal. It penalises those formations by restricting possession to 20% - how it manages to do it is beyond me.
My best guess is that the game engine doesn't cope well with some formations and if it allowed all formations then results could get even weirder than they are. Bottom line is there's no free will in coded games.
so this is something bad to do? I don't get it :X
hello guys, what can I do against such illegal formation?
----ST---ST----
------AMC--AMR
----MC--MC----
------------DMR
--DL-DC--DC-----
-------GK-------
thank you
Is 4-3w-3 an illegal formation?
Maybe u used the wrong player but 433 is as i said a classic formation
4-3w-3 is now illegal formation. It was legal, but now it is not.
If you don't have players for different formation, put ST on AMC before you buy new players.
43w3 isn't ilegal if it's 4 defender ml mc mr.... Many people play 3w...
Only if u play 3 as 3 defensive midfielder, cause u need more than ur 3up in oponents half (mc, or amc o whatever)
So 43w3 (u have to tell people u mean the 3as defensive midfielder) then yes ilegal...
Maybe u right, but i usually play 4312 so, with 3 attacker probably u need another in the middle o so, who knows ;)
arrange a friendly with someone your quality (mourinho)... do yourself that favor.
Well he'll trash me anyway haha
will post screenshot....
But what i dont understand is last week i played 4-3w-3 and got 53% possession. Strange.
Hi, In 2 games I was playing with a 5-4-1 formation.
Both of the times an MC was sent out with a red card, making my formation a 5-3-1, and I got possession 80-20% for my opponent, meaning illegal formation. Why??
I had wingers (both defenders and mid), I got 3 players in mid (ML, MC, MR) and 1 ST. All players in their right position.
So my formation was GK - DL DC DC DC DR - ML MC MR - ST
This shouldn't be an illegal formation, but twice I got 80-20% basically lost the games.
lack of players in central mildfield causes 20% possession. Every formation now needs 2 (not suspended) players in middle of mildfield
What a weird rule, have they never seen a formation in real football with one MC?
As far as I know:
4-3W-3, 5-3W-2, 3n-2wdm-mc-2wam-2, 3n-3wdm-2wam-2
Attachment 30060
how to beat this?
4-3w-3 seems to be back to normal...
Attachment 30142
Attachment 30143