----ST--ST----
-----AMC------
ML----------MR
----------------
DL--DC--DC--DR
This 10 man formation above is seen as Illegal from the NGE after a red card to the MC during the game.
Printable View
----ST--ST----
-----AMC------
ML----------MR
----------------
DL--DC--DC--DR
This 10 man formation above is seen as Illegal from the NGE after a red card to the MC during the game.
Look again and re-readQuote:
Originally Posted by pnr8555
Thanks, July. More evidence to support the hypothesis that either an MC or a DMC is required.Quote:
Originally Posted by July Fourth
Okay, sorry that I didn't read every discussion in this thread but I checked the first post and am confused.
I played this formation:
----ST-ST-------
AML------AMC---
-------MC-----MR
DML-------------
DL-----DC----DR
-------GK-------
Everyone in their natural positions, and I got 20% possession. I've got a GK, 3 Defenders, Midfielders in the middle and the flanks, and Strikers. What have I done wrong?
Maximum of 2 players per flank.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mercury
A guy in my leavue has an illegal formation! How can i post the screenshot?
Attachment 11890
This is a formation of a player.And i have 4-4-2 classic.This player is 14th place in championship .I dominated the match with possesion 68-32 ,an shots on target 20-7 and the final score is 0-0... How is possible? Is a illegal formations?
So it's the same if the formation was like let's say 4-5-1 and the only striker got a red,so you have to place a midfield in his empty position or make a substitution.Quote:
Originally Posted by July Fourth
I guess it's the same if he got injured too.
It's not illegal because he has 3 defenders, a player or two in each flank and a MC and the possession wasn't 80-20Quote:
Originally Posted by Madalin Denis
About the score it happens a lot that you dominate the game but still draw or sometimes lose :mad:
I really don't understand about the rule yet cause' my english is not good
I have seen my friend play this form
st st
amc amc
mc mc
dmc
dl dc dr
is that right?
