Will have a cases GK position can not be kicked, then forced to choose one other player to make a goalkeeper, whether it be illegal???
Printable View
Will have a cases GK position can not be kicked, then forced to choose one other player to make a goalkeeper, whether it be illegal???
It doesn't appear to be illegal. But, sometimes a weaker opponent will end up with 20% possession in that case, so there MAY be a small possession penalty for this.Quote:
Originally Posted by duchao
Just thought of this formation
3N-1-1-4-1. This doesn't seem to be illegal according to the updated post. Will it be illegal??? If unsure about it, I can try it in the league match tonight.
It is not even therein the table for counter formations so I was confused if this is legal......
I also do not understand , What is Illegal squad? :confused:
saw the sept update ...... surely a DM is the same as DMC ? that's just wordplay
DM*Quote:
Originally Posted by TALON1973
The asterisk is a wildcard for L, C or R
OK ...so why isn't MR and ML included as having a midfield player as 3 ? ( not that im using them atm )
As I said above, the asterisk(*) is a wildcard for L, C or RQuote:
Originally Posted by TALON1973
- at least 3 midfielders (DM*, M*, AM*) at least one of which has to be an DMC or MC
I've a cup opponnent who set his tactic in strange way like this:
GK-DL-DC-DMC-ML-MC-MC-AMC-AMC-ST-ST. I suppose it's illegal because number of defenders, but this gut is experienced and his team is strong, so I'm not sure if this is illegal. Could you guys confirm?
Attachment 15208
I played with this formation 2 seasons and no problem ... and last matches i always have 20 % possesion .. can you pls fix this or tell me what to do ?
