So... any ideas, why this formation is illegal? Away-Team-Manager was watching and Home-Team-Manager not, btw.
http://666kb.com/i/cax7ypndac8g363z3.png
Printable View
So... any ideas, why this formation is illegal? Away-Team-Manager was watching and Home-Team-Manager not, btw.
http://666kb.com/i/cax7ypndac8g363z3.png
Kemi, I've used that exact formation before. Without penalty.
So, we're getting some weird results that don't seem to fit any rule. I'm more confused than ever.
Attachment 1181
No possession penalty for me
I got possession penalty with this formation too.
Attachment 1182
I think something is wrong with game engine...see below. 4-3-3 loose possession....
I'm the away side though:D
http://i50.tinypic.com/eqe7nk.jpg
Is 3-3-4 legal?
No 4-2-4 is not two wingers! they are wing FORWARDS! different positions in that the wing forwards are more attacking than wingers. for players to be considered "Forwards" they don't have to be Centre forwards, they are different positions within a band such as forwards, defenders. For example in the Centre back position there are normal CB's then there are sweepers who don't necessarily have to be set up behind CB's. similarly in the forward positions there are different types of forwards Target man, wing forwards, second strikers, poachers etc. a wing forward differs to a winger!
Is just one player on the flank illegal or does both sides have to be occupied?
Like this...
----ST---ST---ST---
----MC---MC---MC--
---------------------
DML-----------------
----DC---DC----DC---