Attachment 2732
Just to add to the data.... 2 games from earlier in the season.... opponent played AMC as GK in each game....
Doesn't seem to have engaged -30% penalty....
Printable View
Attachment 2732
Just to add to the data.... 2 games from earlier in the season.... opponent played AMC as GK in each game....
Doesn't seem to have engaged -30% penalty....
Theoretical Legal Formation Requirements:
Goalkeeper (Must be player's natural position) <---- Don't think so... see earlier screenies
Some combination of at least 3 defenders (i.e. 3 players anywhere in the back row )
At least 1, but no more than 2, players on EACH outside flank. {the D(L/R), DM(L/R), M(L/R), AM(L/R) slots} <--- watched this happen in-game.... I'd say verified true!
at least 3 midfielders (DM*, M*, AM*) at least one of which has to be in the middle row (MC, ML or MR) *This rule isn't totally confirmed
At least 4 players on the opponents side of the pitch. *This rule isn't totally confirmed <--- I have personally suffered under this rule for 28 painful game minutes while trying to play ultra-defensive!
at least 1 Striker
Just by way of updating and/or adding to the discussion.... :D
i often play a 4-5-1V but since i have no players on my team that can play naturally as AMR and AML, i use my MR and ML in those AMR/AML positions. I thus have two players out of position. I have had no problems with that.
I have also had a right back injured once so i used a centreback on the right --> 3 players out of position.
I had no problems whatsoever and it was like normal for me possession wise
btw, it's not illegal to use a DMR and a DR right? as long as I have no MR or AMR it shut be legal, right?
what is this? I can't see her formation or she's playing with only 6 player?
Attachment 3388
First of all thanks for the answers. therefore can I easily defeat her?