You were probably losing because your opponent controlled the midfield with more midfielders.
Printable View
You can have more than 2 wingers. Example the 3-2W-2N-2W-1 (Butterfly) formation. The possesion difference is only accounting for the spectators & because I was playing force counter-attack tactics. Still doesn't reach that 20% penalty.
Attachment 7681Attachment 7682Attachment 7683
I play:
GK
LB CB RB
CDM CDM
MC MC
AMC
STK STk
How is not using wingers illegal??
Jose Mourinho was using this for years at Chelsea with great success, was his tactics illegal???
Ask Nordeus, Darren. Presumably it's a coding and game balance issue.
Could someone tell me how 4222 butterfly looks like? Couldnt find it
Edit: fml wrong thread. Cud u still tell me? c:
3N-2-2-2-1 butterfly is legal. It seems to meet all the requirements. 3W-2-2-2-1 butterfly is illegal because there are 3 players on flanks.
-------ST--------
AML----------AMR
----MC----MC-----
DML----------DMR
----DC-DC-DC----
4-2-2-2 butterfly is illegal, because there are no striker, and there are 3 players on both flanks.
----------------
AML--------AMR
----MC--MC----
DML--------DMR
DL---DC--DC-DR
Its strange because i'm winning games and dominating possession with this tactic & furthermore this is used by some of the top coaches in the world including the face of this game.
I did not play with a 4-4-2 dmc 3 and mc, but always lost couple times That play with ML / MR and AML / AMR, agora game in 3-1-3-1-2 tactic, 1gk, 1dl, 1DR, 1DC, 1dmc, 1MC, 1RM, 1ml, 1amc, 2nd not know you considered it illegal, but I've been playing with players Looking Very She ended up doing the SHE results improve, because she fexa from All Sides make field and When Game against 4-3-3 and so PER dr / dl quarterback, Semper contract dr / dl dc / dc, Cause for That and also, one vario and zonal marking man-to-man depending on quality I tatica opposing faces. so I wanted to take a doubt themselves and illegal
http://imageshack.us/f/35/f6f.png/ my tactic