View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Results 1 to 10 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    54
    You can have more than 2 wingers. Example the 3-2W-2N-2W-1 (Butterfly) formation. The possesion difference is only accounting for the spectators & because I was playing force counter-attack tactics. Still doesn't reach that 20% penalty.
    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-t11-butterfly-formation-1.jpgDefinitive Illegal Formation Rules-t11-butterfly-formation2.jpgDefinitive Illegal Formation Rules-t11-butterfly-formation-3.jpg

  2. #2
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by CIBlue View Post
    You can have more than 2 wingers. Example the 3-2W-2N-2W-1 (Butterfly) formation. The possesion difference is only accounting for the spectators & because I was playing force counter-attack tactics. Still doesn't reach that 20% penalty.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	T11-butterfly formation 1.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	95.1 KB 
ID:	7681Click image for larger version. 

Name:	T11-butterfly formation2.jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	94.9 KB 
ID:	7682Click image for larger version. 

Name:	T11-butterfly formation 3.jpg 
Views:	35 
Size:	94.9 KB 
ID:	7683
    You can have 2 per side. You can't have 3 on the right, or 3 on the left.

    e.g. the following formation is illegal because it has 3 wingers on each side:
    xxx st. xxx st. xxx
    aml xx xxx xx amr
    ml xxx mc. xx mr
    xx xxx xxx xxx xx
    dl. xxx dc. xxx dr
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~