46Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksYou were probably losing because your opponent controlled the midfield with more midfielders.Originally Posted by Charlie Swb
Those rules are not true
Need new rule
You were probably losing because your opponent controlled the midfield with more midfielders.Those rules are not true
Need new rule
You can have more than 2 wingers. Example the 3-2W-2N-2W-1 (Butterfly) formation. The possesion difference is only accounting for the spectators & because I was playing force counter-attack tactics. Still doesn't reach that 20% penalty.
You can have 2 per side. You can't have 3 on the right, or 3 on the left.You can have more than 2 wingers. Example the 3-2W-2N-2W-1 (Butterfly) formation. The possesion difference is only accounting for the spectators & because I was playing force counter-attack tactics. Still doesn't reach that 20% penalty.
e.g. the following formation is illegal because it has 3 wingers on each side:
xxx st. xxx st. xxx
aml xx xxx xx amr
ml xxx mc. xx mr
xx xxx xxx xxx xx
dl. xxx dc. xxx dr
~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~
I play:
GK
LB CB RB
CDM CDM
MC MC
AMC
STK STk
How is not using wingers illegal??
Jose Mourinho was using this for years at Chelsea with great success, was his tactics illegal???
Ask Nordeus, Darren. Presumably it's a coding and game balance issue.
~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~
Could someone tell me how 4222 butterfly looks like? Couldnt find it
Edit: fml wrong thread. Cud u still tell me? c:
Last edited by t0m.-; 06-10-2013 at 10:43 PM.
3N-2-2-2-1 butterfly is legal. It seems to meet all the requirements. 3W-2-2-2-1 butterfly is illegal because there are 3 players on flanks.
-------ST--------
AML----------AMR
----MC----MC-----
DML----------DMR
----DC-DC-DC----
4-2-2-2 butterfly is illegal, because there are no striker, and there are 3 players on both flanks.
----------------
AML--------AMR
----MC--MC----
DML--------DMR
DL---DC--DC-DR
Last edited by pnr8555; 06-15-2013 at 02:57 PM.
๑๐
ทรงพระเจริญ
AEPRE FC
Its strange because i'm winning games and dominating possession with this tactic & furthermore this is used by some of the top coaches in the world including the face of this game.
I did not play with a 4-4-2 dmc 3 and mc, but always lost couple times That play with ML / MR and AML / AMR, agora game in 3-1-3-1-2 tactic, 1gk, 1dl, 1DR, 1DC, 1dmc, 1MC, 1RM, 1ml, 1amc, 2nd not know you considered it illegal, but I've been playing with players Looking Very She ended up doing the SHE results improve, because she fexa from All Sides make field and When Game against 4-3-3 and so PER dr / dl quarterback, Semper contract dr / dl dc / dc, Cause for That and also, one vario and zonal marking man-to-man depending on quality I tatica opposing faces. so I wanted to take a doubt themselves and illegal
my tactic
Reply With Quote
