View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Page 19 of 44 FirstFirst ... 9171819202129 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

  1. #181
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    egypt
    Posts
    1
    if i my on tacticks you should be abel to use what ever formation u like or need toachive the gool even if i use apleyer in rong position other wise it woulden be a tactick

  2. #182
    Newbie Charlie Swb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Colchester
    Posts
    42
    Those rules are not true
    Need new rule

    Last edited by Charlie Swb; 05-18-2013 at 06:45 PM. Reason: Add pics
    WIN
    DRAW
    LOSE

  3. #183
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2
    This mean if i play by this plan , i win
    --- ST --- ST ---
    ------ AC -------
    ML -- MC --- MR
    ------ -- -- DMR
    DL -- DC --- DR

    --- --- ST ------
    AML -- -- --- --
    -- MC MC MC --
    DML -DMC -- --
    -- DC DC DC --
    (No winger on R)


    --- ST ST --- ---
    -- AMC -- --- ---
    -- --- --- MC MR
    --DMC -- --- ---
    -- DC DC DC DR
    (No winger on L)

  4. #184
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2
    This mean if i play by this plan , i win
    --- ST --- ST ---
    ------ AC -------
    ML -- MC --- MR
    ------ -- -- DMR
    DL -- DC --- DR

    --- --- ST ------
    AML -- -- --- --
    -- MC MC MC --
    DML -DMC -- --
    -- DC DC DC --
    (No winger on R)


    --- ST ST --- ---
    -- AMC -- --- ---
    -- --- --- MC MR
    --DMC -- --- ---
    -- DC DC DC DR
    (No winger on L)

  5. #185
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie Swb View Post
    Those rules are not true
    Need new rule

    Care to elaborate?
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  6. #186
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2
    Thank you. Nice thread.

  7. #187
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30
    If someone uses GK as a defender then will the opponent get 80-20 possession??

  8. #188
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Loserpool View Post
    If someone uses GK as a defender then will the opponent get 80-20 possession??
    The best answer I can give you is ... maybe.
    Repeatedly, when an 80/20 possession is encountered and the formation is otherwise legal, there's a player of another position playing in the GK spot.

    BUT, testing an otherwise legal formation using a non-keeper in the GK spot, does NOT result in 20/80 possession.

    I have no idea how to explain these results. So far, nobody else has come up with a working theory either.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  9. #189
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1
    --- --- ST --- ---
    AML--AMC---AMR
    -- --- --- CMF----
    -- DMC --- DMR
    DL DC DC ---

    (formasi ideal)

  10. #190
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    3
    Hi everybody,

    I am playing against a stronger team tonight. His formation is:

    --- ST --- --- ---
    AML --- --- --- ---
    MR MC MC MC MR
    --- DC DC --- DC
    --- --- GK --- ---

    Which formations and tactisc can be effective against this formation?

Page 19 of 44 FirstFirst ... 9171819202129 ... LastLast