Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

[mickyb]

Has anyone tested this formation to confirm legality? -

--ST ST ST
AML - - AMR

DML - - DMR
--DC DC DC

[Razz]

I did not play with a 4-4-2 dmc 3 and mc, but always lost couple times That play with ML / MR and AML / AMR, agora game in 3-1-3-1-2 tactic, 1gk, 1dl, 1DR, 1DC, 1dmc, 1MC, 1RM, 1ml, 1amc, 2nd not know you considered it illegal, but I've been playing with players Looking Very She ended up doing the SHE results improve, because she fexa from All Sides make field and When Game against 4-3-3 and so PER dr / dl quarterback, Semper contract dr / dl dc / dc, Cause for That and also, one vario and zonal marking man-to-man depending on quality I tatica opposing faces. so I wanted to take a doubt themselves and illegal

3w-1-3w-1-2 is a legal formation.
3n-1-3w-1-2 or 3w-1-3n-1-2 are both legal too.
3n-1-3n-1-2 would be illegal.

I hope that answers your question. Although I'm not even sure if you are asking a question because your translator is garbage. The mods might get mad, but I'd suggest posting both the translation and your native language.

[Razz]

I play:
GK
LB CB RB
CDM CDM
MC MC
AMC
STK STk

How is not using wingers illegal??
Jose Mourinho was using this for years at Chelsea with great success, was his tactics illegal???

You have a player on each flank as I highlighted in bold. So this formation would be legal in T11.

[Razz]

Has anyone tested this formation to confirm legality? -

--ST ST ST
AML - - AMR

DML - - DMR
--DC DC DC

it meets all the requirements that I'm aware of, but I haven't tested it. You'd still have lousy possession though because of the lack of players at center.

[matcho13579]

So this one (3W-4-2(AML/R)-1) is illegal, right?

[andrayen]

about an illegal formation
when we place 2DC-2(dml/dmr)-2mc-2(aml/amr)-2st..

---st---st---
-aml----amr-
---mc--mc---
-dml----dmr-
---dc--dc---
-----gk-----

is it still call Illegal..?

[Razz]

Which of these rules is confusing?

• Some combination of at least 3 defenders (i.e. 3 players anywhere in the back row )
• At least 1, but no more than 2, players on EACH outside flank. {the D(L/R), DM(L/R), M(L/R), AM(L/R) slots}
• at least 3 midfielders (DM*, M*, AM*) at least one of which has to be an DM* or M*
• At least 4 players on the opponents side of the pitch.
• at least 1 Striker

[fadhul17]

about an illegal formation
when we place 2DC-2(dml/dmr)-2mc-2(aml/amr)-2st..

---st---st---
-aml----amr-
---mc--mc---
-dml----dmr-
---dc--dc---
-----gk-----

is it still call Illegal..?

Yup it's illegal. I hve tested it, and got 20% ball possession.
My advice remove ur striker to defender. And up to 2dc, down to dc.

[pnr8555]

So this one (3W-4-2(AML/R)-1) is illegal, right?

3 players on flanks, that definitely illegal formation!

Is red cards illegalise the formation?

[Pete Cuffe]

i played a superb bot robot, won 3-1 just, he had three gk on the pitch and got 46% possesion, so its all utter rubbish really, beat the top of league yesterday 4-1-3w-1-2 wide diamond with 4-1-1-1-3 by accident, forgot to watch + 5 away team won 2-0 haha this is 5th season and ive spent £13 ! a fool and his football are soon skint, ktf