Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: help against asymetric formation

  1. 08-30-2013 #1
    crsbrwn2000
    crsbrwn2000 is offline
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    71

    help against asymetric formation

    help against asymetric formation-t11.jpgHi, I have a team in my league which plays with an asymmetric formation, with a flat back four, DM, CM slightly to the left, MR, AML, AMC right of centre and a central striker. any idea what would be the best formation to use against this?
    Last edited by crsbrwn2000; 08-30-2013 at 11:08 PM. Reason: added image of formation
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-01-2013 #2
    crsbrwn2000
    crsbrwn2000 is offline
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    71
    Anyone willing to help?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 09-01-2013 #3
    fmldotcom
    fmldotcom is offline
    Famous fmldotcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,026
    depends on your team...
    My Team<<<<<<<< When we lose one blessing, another is often most unexpectedly given in its place.” –C. S. Lewis


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 09-01-2013 #4
    Prince Umair
    Prince Umair is offline
    Rookie Prince Umair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Madan
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by crsbrwn2000 View Post
    Click image for larger version.  Name: t11.jpg  Views: 27  Size: 94.5 KB  ID: 11678Hi, I have a team in my league which plays with an asymmetric formation, with a flat back four, DM, CM slightly to the left, MR, AML, AMC right of centre and a central striker. any idea what would be the best formation to use against this?
    I will go for 4-1-3-2
    st...st
    mc..mc..mc
    dmc
    dr..dc..dc..dl
    The one word that makes a good manager - decisiveness.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-03-2013 #5
    crsbrwn2000
    crsbrwn2000 is offline
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    71
    Thanks for the suggestions, have also found that 442 and 451v seem to get results against it as well
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »