I played first leg and was draw2-2 away, I played 3-1-3-2-1
Should I use same formation or try something like 4-1-3n-2?
I played first leg and was draw2-2 away, I played 3-1-3-2-1
Should I use same formation or try something like 4-1-3n-2?
I don't think you need 4 in the back, since he has no of. wingers.
Something like 3N-1-4-0-2, should do.
EDIT
Your opponent's formation has the "illusion" that it has a strong attack, but that really isn't the case. It's a rather balanced formation, but with a strong middle pressing. In fact, his defense could even be slightly stronger than his attack, depending on what arrow he places on the DMC.
Last edited by kebess; 10-01-2013 at 05:56 AM. Reason: Rephrased for better understanding
if he uses a 4-4-2 (narrow diamond) you can use a formation that lock his midfield and let some of your players free.
try using a 4-1-2-2-1 (v-style) passing through the flanks and blue arrow on your dmc if his amc give u trouble Your AMR/AML are free to take him down
Axis Force 88Because every force has 3 axes and a resultant, in this case DEFENSE, MIDDLE AND FORWARD, and the result is VICTORY!
Hi could you guys help me out.
I'm trying to work out a formation to counter this.
Attachment 13130
Judging from the way his matches have gone, i feel he is sure to play attacking.
So i kind of worked this out.
Attachment 13131
Orders : mentality-attacking, passing-through the middle, pressing-own half, tackling-normal, passing-mixed, marking-zonal.
Please do give your thoughts on this. Or if you could suggest something better it would be very helpful.
Thanks.
i sugest you dont use many red arrow on your players, because they'll get tired fast.
red arrow on your mcs are fine
Axis Force 88Because every force has 3 axes and a resultant, in this case DEFENSE, MIDDLE AND FORWARD, and the result is VICTORY!
Thanks for the suggestion.
But as you can see i have no ML.
So do you think 4-1-2-0-3 would be a good option.