Results 1 to 9 of 9
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By duchao

Thread: Is this Formation Legal? 3-0-2-3-2

  1. #1
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    160

    Unhappy Is this Formation Legal? 3-0-2-3-2

    Hi, I'm new here. I've been reading the forum from the back seat, and manage to resolve most of the formation tactics just by reading through the guides.

    However, I'm due to face this Lvl 6 Pro (I'm only Lvl 3) in the Cup matches, whose formation I have yet to stumble upon:

    ------ST*----ST-------
    --AML---AMC---AMR--
    ------MC*----MC------
    ----------------------
    ------DC*-DC-DC------

    He seems to be heavy on attack, but lack defense. My thoughts are Counter Attack (tick).
    He's average quality is 29.4, but has a good GK (36), DC (35), MC (43), and ST(38) which I've put a "*" in the formation above. My average quality is 30.9, I don't have any particularly good player, they are all averaged out 5*.

    My plan of countering his formation is:

    ------ST----ST-------
    --AML----------AMR--
    ------MC----MC------
    --DML---DMC---DMR--
    ------DC----DC------

    However, i think this might be illegal as there are only 2 defenders (unless DML, DMC, DMR are considered defenders).
    Any advice? Currently don't have any DML/DMRs.

    Cheers.

  2. #2
    English Forum Moderator Cat Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    8,062
    Yes you need three guys on back line
    Expressed above is my own opinion. Your results may vary.
    ▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB
    < ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  3. #3
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    160
    Thanks Cat.
    Just realized I had 12 players on the field, will post the question under tactics forum.

  4. #4
    Dreamer duchao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    477
    422 classsic and select defensive and counter-attack
    Cat Harrison likes this.
    Du học Đài Loan vừa học vừa làm - Tư vấn Du học Đài Loan chi phí thấp, vừa học vừa làm, hỗ trợ việc làm thêm thu nhập hấp dẫn.

  5. #5
    English Forum Moderator Cat Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    8,062
    Ha ha I didn't notice it was too many, only that it had 2 defender.
    Expressed above is my own opinion. Your results may vary.
    ▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB
    < ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  6. #6
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    160
    Quote Originally Posted by duchao View Post
    422 classsic and select defensive and counter-attack
    I'm sure u mean 4-4-2 Classic.. u suggested 442 in this thread but 4-1-2-1-2 in another?

    My concern are the ST and AM rows, without the DMs, can it pull through?

  7. #7
    Rookie Killerbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    130
    Go for 4-5-1 V style or 4-4-2 narrow diamond.

  8. #8
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    160
    Thanks guys, 4-4-2 Narrow Diamond (4-1-2-1-2) seems to be the favorite against that formation, I shall give it a try tonight. Fingers crossed.

    All defenders Blue arrows, DMC neutral, MC, AMC and ST red arrows, correct?

  9. #9
    English Forum Moderator Cat Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    8,062
    Thats a lot of arrows! try with only on DC and AMC. You will tire out your team and they might perform badly second half. Just my opinion..
    Expressed above is my own opinion. Your results may vary.
    ▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB
    < ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]