Quote Originally Posted by Der_Ryan_M View Post
Hello, there!

I watch many teams, on my friendslist, my enemies, the opponents of my friends, my own team and even some other and for me it seems like teams, that use these players, are more successful.
From my own experiences I can tell, that I play the 4-1-2-1-2 ND now since approximately 3-4 seasons, and I didnt win a single title with it, everytime lower rated teams with MR and ML were more successful than me. Before, I played the 4-4-2 classical, so with an ML/MR instead of the AMC/DMC I use now and i had more success, even against sometimes stronger opponents... Two days ago, I lost 7-1 at home against a weaker 4-1-3-2 Team, that had a ML/MR, which is an absolutely ridiculous result, but thats not the question.
I dont want to hear formation talks, but i would like to hear your opinions and experiences dealing with this problem.

Greets, Ryan
well from my experience and since i played 4-5-1V for almost 8 seasons the AMR-Ls that i had where the most valuable players.I guess its the formation that "helped" them ,and the tactics i used(through the flanks).
I have changed to ND as u,in the past 5 seasons,so i still have AMR-Ls but they are also AMCs.

I think its a "must" for any team to have wings,cause u can have multiply ways of attacking,or defending.My experience says that is better to have an AMR-L being also MR-L that to have AMR-L being also AMC.

i have found players with this particular roles in first seasons ,now i can't..so i have to live with it and adjust some of my games without the opportunity of having wings if i want to change my formation during the game.I use some of my Mcs to MR-L,sometimes they perform well sometimes no.U can use it and see what happens.

But generally i believe that wings are needed for ur squad,even if u play a formation that don't have any.