narrow diamond, with MCs instead of ML and MR
Printable View
narrow diamond, with MCs instead of ML and MR
Well, gave good shot but lost. :o)
2-4
Started with the V... Could punch one in though so
Moved to 4-4-1-1 but too late.
He scored all in first half, I changed and kept him out if goal
remainder of game. Got me 2 scores all in 2nd half :-/
It's ok, felt like we gave him all we had.
Thanks everyone for suggestions
Shark....
tough loss. hope next year goes better for you!
I finally had a convincing win against this formation. I used my standard 4-1-2-1-2 (DMC-ML-MR-AMC). However, my average rating is higher (19.2 vs 17.9), but on the same token, I was without my best player (Miloslav Merrick, a 28 MC).
Attachment 23164
I'm also curious why there wasn't a man of the match (sorry for going off topic, lol).
I'm finding the 3N-5V-2 works pretty well against this variation of the 4-2-3-1 :)
