4-4-2 or 4-1-2-2-1 ?

[Rna]

Hello, i can't choose between two formations :
GK
DR / DC / DC / DL
MR / MC / MC / ML
ST / ST

and

GK
DR / DC / DC / DL
DMC
MC / MC
AMR / AML
ST

Which is better for you ?
Thanks

(Sorry i'm french)

[Dame]

i think 4-1-2-2-1 is better but i suggest you to try: 4-1-2-3
GK
DR / DC / DC / DL
DMC
MC / MC
ST / ST / ST

[Rna]

Thanks for your help, but with this formation, the sides aren't too empty ? Because there isn't MR/ML or AMR/AML

Sorry for my english...

[Dame]

No they arent i play with opponent with focus passing: down both flanks and i win he was little bit powerful of me and i win, also i use this formation all of the time and i have good results good luck

[Rna]

Thanks for your help i will think about it

Other points of view maybe ?

[Rna]

up, others ?

[dippo]

I am using 4-5-1v (4-1-2-2-1) and its a pretty solid formation. Strong in defense and attack. I saw a lot of people on the forum suggesting it so I used it and it is working wonders for me

[Rna]

I am using 4-5-1v (4-1-2-2-1) and its a pretty solid formation. Strong in defense and attack. I saw a lot of people on the forum suggesting it so I used it and it is working wonders for me

Ok thanks

[BleedMage]

i think 4-1-2-2-1 is better but i suggest you to try: 4-1-2-3
GK
DR / DC / DC / DL
DMC
MC / MC
ST / ST / ST

its crap, easy to counter with 4141

[Brian Dang]

its crap, easy to counter with 4141

Every formation also can be beaten...
It all depend on your players quality...
4-51v could be demolished by 3N-4-1-2 as well ..but vice versa...
4-4-2c mostly dead with 3-5-2 flat or ND or even 4-5-1V but they all so can beat tem if you are stronger and right strategy...