Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Is this formation viable? 3-2-2-1-2

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    208
    Quote Originally Posted by YankeeDK View Post
    ____ST_____ST____
    _______AMC_______
    ____MC_____MC____
    DML___________DMR
    ____DC_DC_DC_____

    I can't find much about it on these forums so here is my reasoning:

    - I want 2 ST. I tried with less and I am just an attacking kind of guy.
    - I want a shadow striker. It's just too awesome when they bomb the goal from 30 metres.
    - It's "cheap" on substitutes with 7 players on 3 different position.
    - DML and DMR are often cheap because few people use them.
    - Blue arrows on DMs when facing AMR/Ls.

    For orders I am thinking attacking/middle/own half/normal/short/zonal without counter or offside trap.


    Any input?
    I tried this tactic many times before, and i realise that use 1 tactic for all matches is bad. This tactic is not strong enough to win another strong midfielder tactics, such as 4-1-3n-2, 3n-1-4-2, 4-1-4-1, 3n-5-2, 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond...You'll lose possession and make least shots. Especially, when you lost from some corner kicks or free kicks, it's too hard too find goals against them.

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by talisman View Post
    I played that formation against 4-5-1V a couple of days ago against the team the did the double over me last season and won the Championship because of that... won 5-2 away...
    4-5-1V is a popular formation so it's good to know it can be used against that.

    Quote Originally Posted by padrino View Post
    I tried this tactic many times before, and i realise that use 1 tactic for all matches is bad. This tactic is not strong enough to win another strong midfielder tactics, such as 4-1-3n-2, 3n-1-4-2, 4-1-4-1, 3n-5-2, 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond...You'll lose possession and make least shots. Especially, when you lost from some corner kicks or free kicks, it's too hard too find goals against them.
    I am going to give it a trial by fire tonight against one of the formations you mentioned: 3N-5-2. It's a home game against a weaker opponent so it should be an easy win.

  3. #3
    VIP talisman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Clevedon, UK
    Posts
    3,779
    Quote Originally Posted by padrino View Post
    I tried this tactic many times before, and i realise that use 1 tactic for all matches is bad. This tactic is not strong enough to win another strong midfielder tactics, such as 4-1-3n-2, 3n-1-4-2, 4-1-4-1, 3n-5-2, 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond...You'll lose possession and make least shots. Especially, when you lost from some corner kicks or free kicks, it's too hard too find goals against them.
    Used this formation this evening against a 3N-1-4-1-1 (Cross?) formation. Was a struggle all way through but as the opposition players were performing poorly (one 4 and three 5s), eventually got through 3-0.

    Is this formation viable? 3-2-2-1-2-league-fm-s22-round-5.jpg
    Last edited by talisman; 05-09-2015 at 10:39 PM.
    Any formation or tactics advice given is based purely on experience with my teams...