How to beat 4-1-3W-2

[Tactician]

Try 3-3W-2N-2 or 3-2W-2N-1-2.

Red arrows on MCs for 3-3W-2N-2.

Both these orders can be used for the above formations.

If it is for a home match, use the following.
mentality: normal
passing focus: middle
passing: mixed
tackling: normal
marking: zonal
pressing: own half
no offside trap

If it is for an away match, use the following.
mentality: defensive
passing focus: middle
passing: mixed
tackling: normal or hard
marking: zonal
pressing: own half
force counter attacks
no offside trap

[cousland]

Thanks for the tips. I started with 3-3W-2N-2 and conceded two goals. Switched to 3-2W-2N-1-2 and conceded another two for a 4-0 loss. With +4 AQ and home stadium advantage. I think the cards are just stacked against me for this league.

[Tactician]

On paper, the two formations I have given you should have done the job. Losing by conceding 4 goals with such a formation is way too much. At least a draw with no goals or minimum goals was expected.
What orders did you use?
Post your team, the match statistics and ratings.

[Tactician]

The previous match you used a 4-5-1 V-style, and you lost. So, I assumed that his wingers were the cause as the opposing AMC and STs are covered by 4-5-1 V-style. I suggested the first formation to block the wingers, the AMC and the STs, and attack through the middle with the red arrows as it is two MCs against one MC, but it seems that it did not work.

The idea of the second formation was to block the wingers, dominate possession in midfield and exploit the space between the 4 defenders and the single MC.

It seems that the cause may be your players or fixed match results from Nordeus.

[Tactician]

I have seen a forum user suggesting 4-2-3-1 for use against 4-1-3-2. Next time you face such a formation, try this one. The orders are: normal or attacking, mixed focus, mixed passing, full pitch pressing, normal or hard tackling.