Offensive / defensive formations

[Duncton]

Hi all,

First off, I don't even know if there is such a thing. Point is that I know (more or less) how to put up a counter formation (I've read a bit around this forum ), but I'm not always sure on how to play it.

Usually I'm alternating between 4-5-1 V, which I play defensive (flanks, counter attack) en 4-4-2 ND, which I play attacking (through the middle), based on my oppenent's defense. Sometimes I need something else.

My next match in CL is against a 4-5-1 Flat of equal average quality. I've decided to play 3-5-2 flat, especially since I don't need four defenders against his lone striker. But I don't know if I should play it attacking or defensive.

So here's my question: do certain formations work better with either attacking or defensive mentality? If so, how do I recognize those? Or is attacking / defensive mentality based on totally different parameters (like average quality or playing style)?

Looking forward to hear your opinions.

[talisman]

My principle - home and superior (Q-wise), or away and much superior, play an attacking formation; otherwise defensive.

Although it can be over-ridden if I can see a history of the opposition overcoming superior opponents, then I play defensive.

I think in general, the more players nearer your goal than the opponents, the more defensive the formation.

[Duncton]

Right, thanks. I'll see if I can figure it out.

Forgot about playing attacking at home when possible. I'll keep that in mind.