My opponent's is trying to let me know he wants to draw?!?!? :D
Attachment 3403
Reading the illegal formation rules (point five) I think it will be declared illegal!
what do you people think?
Printable View
My opponent's is trying to let me know he wants to draw?!?!? :D
Attachment 3403
Reading the illegal formation rules (point five) I think it will be declared illegal!
what do you people think?
yes, i believe it is illegal.
I would play a 3-0-3N-1-3 and hope for a goal-fest up the middle.
-------ST---ST---ST-------
-----------AMC------------
------MC---MC---MC-------
---------------------------
-------DC--DC---DC-------
If you are worried about his DML/DMR coming up the flanks, go with:
----------ST---ST----------
------------AMC------------
--ML-----MC---MC-----MR--
----------------------------
-------DC--DC---DC-------
Up the middle of course.
He can park the bus, but if you play offensive and cover your butt, the 80/20 possession from the illegal formation, coupled with the offense, it should be a win for you.
Why would you give up the possession bonus? Or did you mean wide defence?Quote:
Originally Posted by cracicot
like that?
Attachment 3404
thank you for the advice!
I win 3-0 using this formation
----------ST---ST----------
------------AMC------------
--ML-----MC---MC-----MR--
----------------------------
-------DC--DC---DC-------
from 55' till the end i played 3-5-2 Vstyle
Another illegal formation?
Attachment 3426
Yep illegal because he's using just 2 defenders.Quote:
Originally Posted by dafide
Thanx.
His dmc is also a dc so I think he will change at the last moment his formation in 3N-4-1-2
What do you advice me? I think I will use 4-5-1 Vstyle or 3N-1(dmc)-3W-1.
4-5-1 Vstyle should work. Just make sure to attack by the flanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by dafide
Thank you very much!
So DMC/L/R are not defenders?
I used this setup and got 20% possession.
- ST - ST -
AML - - - AMR
- MC - MC -
DML - - - DMR
- DC - DC -
GK
Taking a look at the color code I kind of understand that they are midfielders, but then why are they not counted towards minimum midfielders for legal formation? Cause AMC/L/R are midfielders, are they not?
..or am I just missing something here? *confused*
