3-2-3-2 or 3-2-2-1-2

[Jeinov]

Hey, what you think for 3-2-3-2
------GK------
--DC-DC-DC---
-DMR-----DML-
--MC-MC-MC--
----ST--ST----

OR

3-2-2-1-2

------GK------
--DC-DC-DC---
-DMR-----DML-
----MC-MC----
------AMC----
----ST--ST----

Who formations is better and please tell me what tactics I use: Now is that: attacking,mixed,whole field,normal,short pass,zonal and counter attacks and ambushes.

[Morgan O'Bree]

Hey, what you think for 3-2-3-2
------GK------
--DC-DC-DC---
-DMR-----DML-
--MC-MC-MC--
----ST--ST----

OR

3-2-2-1-2

------GK------
--DC-DC-DC---
-DMR-----DML-
----MC-MC----
------AMC----
----ST--ST----

Who formations is better and please tell me what tactics I use: Now is that: attacking,mixed,whole field,normal,short pass,zonal and counter attacks and ambushes.

They are both pretty good expecially against 3 def formations and V style. I'd focus the second one on through middle though, and use in both mixed passing instead of short.