I am thinking 4-1-4-1
Printable View
I am thinking 4-1-4-1
Illegal formation.
4-5-1V should do the trick.
It's illegal formation. Easy win!!
Why is it illegal? He doesn't have ML/MC/MR but you don't need one. He'll lose a little bit of possession but it's not an illegal formation.. and by no means an easy win either.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pistolero
Look
http://i1178.photobucket.com/albums/...ps47fd6bdd.jpg
4-5-1 v should work but see where his attacks are coming from or else your flanks might be punished
I don't have AMLs and AMRs yet. How about 4-1-4-1 with the MR and ML with red arrows?
Is it really happen? lolQuote:
Originally Posted by dv8r
Played 4-1-4-1 with red arrows for MR and ML. Normal, mixed, own half, normal, mixed, zonal, no counter, no off trap. Won 3-0 on 58-42 possession (13% possession bonus for me). The opp qual was overall 6.6 points lower than mine, but I played only with the subs.
I guess dv8r was right, 4-2DMC-3AML,AMC,AMR-1 is not an illegal formation.
I think its game engine!! lol make no sense .. Or anyone can you explain it? 4-4-2 can lost the ball possession against this formation? Gimme me your analysis. I would appreciate it. Thanks alot :)
this formation is very dificult! i use 4-2-1-3 and lose 0-1 but i miraculously tied 1-1 and i change to 4-1-2-1-2ND and won 1-2 none ST scores! only one MC and DMC score for me and DMC score for him.
http://global3.memecdn.com/i-also-li..._o_1076620.jpg