4-2DMC-3(AML,AMC,AMR) -1. What do you suggest ?

[nicuioanid]

I am thinking 4-1-4-1

[El Pistolero]

Illegal formation.

4-5-1V should do the trick.

[fadhul17]

It's illegal formation. Easy win!!

[dv8r]

Illegal formation.

4-5-1V should do the trick.

Why is it illegal? He doesn't have ML/MC/MR but you don't need one. He'll lose a little bit of possession but it's not an illegal formation.. and by no means an easy win either.

Look


4-5-1 v should work but see where his attacks are coming from or else your flanks might be punished

[nicuioanid]

I don't have AMLs and AMRs yet. How about 4-1-4-1 with the MR and ML with red arrows?

[fadhul17]

Is it really happen? lol

[nicuioanid]

Played 4-1-4-1 with red arrows for MR and ML. Normal, mixed, own half, normal, mixed, zonal, no counter, no off trap. Won 3-0 on 58-42 possession (13% possession bonus for me). The opp qual was overall 6.6 points lower than mine, but I played only with the subs.
I guess dv8r was right, 4-2DMC-3AML,AMC,AMR-1 is not an illegal formation.

[fadhul17]

I think its game engine!! lol make no sense .. Or anyone can you explain it? 4-4-2 can lost the ball possession against this formation? Gimme me your analysis. I would appreciate it. Thanks alot

[Geodude]

this formation is very dificult! i use 4-2-1-3 and lose 0-1 but i miraculously tied 1-1 and i change to 4-1-2-1-2ND and won 1-2 none ST scores! only one MC and DMC score for me and DMC score for him.