4-4-2 ND gone bad!

[tziortz]

I had a really weird match today, it was for the champions league, in first leg i won the guy 1-4 with narrow diamond, he is using 4-4-2 flat, the team is actually abandoned, the weird is that today i had the second match in my stadium, and despite him having the exact same formation and players, and me having only one change, (a 5* ST was replaced by a scout) i lost the match 0-1, and having possession 70-30%, so i guess narrow diamond is not a 100% i have 10 points stronger team btw

[dv8r]

I had a really weird match today, it was for the champions league, in first leg i won the guy 1-4 with narrow diamond, he is using 4-4-2 flat, the team is actually abandoned, the weird is that today i had the second match in my stadium, and despite him having the exact same formation and players, and me having only one change, (a 5* ST was replaced by a scout) i lost the match 0-1, and having possession 70-30%, so i guess narrow diamond is not a 100% i have 10 points stronger team btw

4-1-2-1-2 ND was never a counter formation for 4-4-2 classic... i cant understand why it would be.

[El Pistolero]

4-5-1v against the 4-4-2.

Works for me.

[tziortz]

I don't know if it is a counter for 4-4-2 flat, but its mentioned a lot, and worked for me all the previous matches, but maybe i will try the 4-5-1v next time, i was just wondering how is it possible to win 4-1 the first match, and with exactly the same formation from the opponent and a better quality from me at the second match to lose, probably bad day it was my first defeat

[Marchelo1988]

My experience with 4-1-2-1-2 against 4-4-2 standard is not good either. I used it in a Cup match a couple days ago against a slightly worse team than mine and tied 2-2. Fortunately I managed to win 1-4 in the second leg using a 4w-3w-1-2

[thon]

442 cancels wingers and 1 up front.