it's called 3-5-2 v style. It's an attackive version of the 4-5-1 v style. to counter 4-5-1v I normally play 4-3N-2W-1.
I've not tested it but 3-3N-2W-2 might work? It is a risk though.
Maybe the butterfly might work? or 4-4-2. Sorry, it does give me a head ache. Hope I've gave some input![]()
It looks good on paper but I'm not sure as technically you have 1 CM. I'd test that in a friendly first and keep an eye on the possession.
Also, too many arrows bud.
If you want to be safe, go for 4-4-2.
So 4 4 2 OR 4 5 1 V styleok Thx .. btw iam 31.8 he 30.4 so it`s so close
Thx Again
Good luck! let us know how you get on![]()
4-3-2-1 might work!
I think that each formation that exploits the flanks can work. You need to focus down both flanks.
4-2-3-1, 4-3-2-1, 4-4-2, 4-3-3 with strong fullbacks or/and AML/AMR etc. Attack down both flanks and defend with 4 at the back line and you'll match him tactically 100%.
this 3-1-2-2-2 is too vulnerable as a main tactic
A football team is like a beautiful woman. When you do not tell her, she forgets she is beautiful
I agree.