Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 3n-2n-1-2n-2

  1. 06-13-2013 #1
    Kukilon
    Kukilon is offline
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    156

    3n-2n-1-2n-2

    Never seen this formation before. I'm guessing 4-5-1V should be good but I usually want to play two strikers against wide defenders. How good are the DMCs to soak up the preassure in a lineup like this?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-13-2013 #2
    tziortz
    tziortz is offline
    Apprentice tziortz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    196
    how is 3N wide ? thats also an illegal formation, i would probably use 3N-1-4-2 or 3n-5v-2
    ✰✰OCFP✰✰
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-13-2013 #3
    Kukilon
    Kukilon is offline
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    156
    Sorry meant 3W in the back.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-15-2013 #4
    Kukilon
    Kukilon is offline
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    156
    Whatever you do don't go 3-5-2V against this formation. I turned it around while playing 4-5-1V. 3 in the back was to few against their offence.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »