I used it in a couple of games and saw that my condition loss was like other times (above 20%).
Also I think Al Svaberg made a test but don't remember exactly the post/thread.
Type: Posts; User: nikolgiorgos
I used it in a couple of games and saw that my condition loss was like other times (above 20%).
Also I think Al Svaberg made a test but don't remember exactly the post/thread.
Ι answered about the bonus as you bold this
using condition bonus doesn't mean that at the end of the game, your players gonna have less condition loss ....
so, again what was the question ?...
I think you give the answer by yourself
some facts
- in every (official)game there is a condition loss of 22-25%
- there is also a (small) role dice in c.l. of every player
I mean in one game...
using condition bonus doesn't mean that at the end of the game, your players gonna have less condition loss (like the opposite - when you use high pressing or mtm marking, you 're loosing more...
my philosophy is to start with def/counters + def.bonus , trying to be careful not conceded a goal early and then trying to "read" the game.
yes, why not
I use high press. + attack as emergency buttons if the game doesn't go well
if it's late, I use too m-t-m (because if it's early in the game, before 50', the double condition loss of those two,...