Let's continue time to time with the Bible of "how to make assos more fair" and suggest a relation of points obtained to the 1vs1's star differance to try to penalize the manipulations, so:

5*(as a base AvQ reference-standard number) vs +1* or -1* = no penalty

5* facing a 3*, 2* or 1* (best 14, not 11 field displayed) /no points


5* facing a 7* or+ = +25%


And this allow us to discuss how good or bad can be this system.


So lets say:

50 points for winning a tournament, assos should have a "assigned/fixed points depending if 4,5,6 members + variables"

so, a asso of 5 members can have:
10 points sure of 50 if win + 10x5 (if the teams face at least teams of -1 star, so inside a some standards)

If a 5* face a 3* no 10 points +6 of the 2 wins counted.

So yep, basically relate the points to a individual difficulty/performance.