Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree4Likes
  • 2 Post By Buffs Mad
  • 1 Post By Staggy Stagg
  • 1 Post By Cat Harrison

Thread: Unfair "top rated" ranking

  1. #1
    Newbie Tom Brandão's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    São Paulo, Brasil
    Posts
    18

    Unfair "top rated" ranking

    Guys, the "top rated" ranking of the league is NOT fair.

    If a player plays only one league match and he has a great performance (rated as 9), he will be the best rated of the league. On the other hand, if another player has an unbelievable performance as being rated 9 on 25 matches and rated 8 on only one match, he will loose for that first one.

    In my opinion, there should be a minimum number of matches played by each player for he be eligible as the league top rated.

  2. #2
    VIP Buffs Mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,270
    Common complaint and I agree again

  3. #3
    Addicted
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    551
    I agree, but, you do not get anything for having the highest rated player nor the top scorer or top assist, so it is largely irrelevant.
    uegibby likes this.

  4. #4
    English Forum Moderator Cat Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    8,062
    I agree that there should be a minimum # of matches played (I favor that number being at least half of possible matches)
    Tom Brandão likes this.
    Expressed above is my own opinion. Your results may vary.
    ▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB
    < ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    45
    I agree with that issue. I also agree with it being irrelevant. I mostly ignore this ranking. As for me they could drop it completely. I wish they would expand the top goals/top assists ranking to show the best 10 players instead.