Unfair "top rated" ranking

[Tom Brandão]

Guys, the "top rated" ranking of the league is NOT fair.

If a player plays only one league match and he has a great performance (rated as 9), he will be the best rated of the league. On the other hand, if another player has an unbelievable performance as being rated 9 on 25 matches and rated 8 on only one match, he will loose for that first one.

In my opinion, there should be a minimum number of matches played by each player for he be eligible as the league top rated.

[Buffs Mad]

Common complaint and I agree again

[Staggy Stagg]

I agree, but, you do not get anything for having the highest rated player nor the top scorer or top assist, so it is largely irrelevant.

[Cat Harrison]

I agree that there should be a minimum # of matches played (I favor that number being at least half of possible matches)

[Dennis Janosch]

I agree with that issue. I also agree with it being irrelevant. I mostly ignore this ranking. As for me they could drop it completely. I wish they would expand the top goals/top assists ranking to show the best 10 players instead.