Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By John Grant

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: how about to host "Top eleven World Championship"?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by John Grant View Post
    So what your saying is you want a tournament ( I assume with a trophy for bragging and whatever other rewards are offered ) that would exclude a pretty large proportion of the total managers in the game ? Yeah that sounds pretty fair to me and I fully support the idea .............yeah right.
    Through the wonderful world of Asso I have seen a few over 40 managers , some decent , some not and at the same time I have seen some below that level who are as good as anything I have seen above 40. I guess you are trying to say only experienced managers should be allowed to participate but experience doesnt come with a number and cant really be quantified that way.
    So my question would be ...why 40 ? Is there something magical about 40 that suddenly transforms all managers into magicians and wizards ?
    Hmm. So what you want to ask is why should it be above level 40?



    It's simple.



    I set a measure of my ability to compete to win some of the best in the world championships.



    I have been promoted to the league for playing the Top-Eleven for at least 40 seasons, or forty months, at level 40, and I have had the opportunity to advance to the Champions League, league, or cup competition as well as the Super League, It is.



    Is not a team with such a high score for at least 40 seasons a good place to go to the world championship? I thought about the criteria. I do not care whether you raise or lower this standard.



    Anyway, for the first time in five years or more, the top-eleven players will have at least 40 seasons of experience, and they will have a lot of experience, a good season, and someone who knows better at top eleven tactics. Would not you? The game experience that has been polished during the season is not to be ignored, but rather I think I need to raise the level. The strongest is that the strongest person must literally take.





    I'll tell you another example of a game contest: Riot's League of Legends, Blizzard's Heroes of the Storm, and StarCraft 2. They have own regional league and world championships.



    Even regional conventions for this World Congress have a requirement to participate in the qualification. For StarCraft 2, the ladder must reach the minimum master league, and the League of Legends will be the same for Challenger or Master, Heroes of the Storm. Why do you think they set this up? Is it because it is the master league level that the requirements for possessing the ability to match the right of the competition league? I thought it was level 40 for the same reason.

    I think this is the answer.

  2. #2
    Apprentice John Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by blueflamedevil View Post
    Hmm. So what you want to ask is why should it be above level 40?



    It's simple.



    I set a measure of my ability to compete to win some of the best in the world championships.



    I have been promoted to the league for playing the Top-Eleven for at least 40 seasons, or forty months, at level 40, and I have had the opportunity to advance to the Champions League, league, or cup competition as well as the Super League, It is.



    Is not a team with such a high score for at least 40 seasons a good place to go to the world championship? I thought about the criteria. I do not care whether you raise or lower this standard.



    Anyway, for the first time in five years or more, the top-eleven players will have at least 40 seasons of experience, and they will have a lot of experience, a good season, and someone who knows better at top eleven tactics. Would not you? The game experience that has been polished during the season is not to be ignored, but rather I think I need to raise the level. The strongest is that the strongest person must literally take.





    I'll tell you another example of a game contest: Riot's League of Legends, Blizzard's Heroes of the Storm, and StarCraft 2. They have own regional league and world championships.



    Even regional conventions for this World Congress have a requirement to participate in the qualification. For StarCraft 2, the ladder must reach the minimum master league, and the League of Legends will be the same for Challenger or Master, Heroes of the Storm. Why do you think they set this up? Is it because it is the master league level that the requirements for possessing the ability to match the right of the competition league? I thought it was level 40 for the same reason.

    I think this is the answer.
    To answer this properly and as it should be answered would probably get me a ban for not respecting other peoples opinion.

    I will say this though.............. no I better not.................stuff it I will say it .............. do you seriously think that a manager under level 40 would not know what to do on match day because he hasnt got enough experience ? The only real difference between a manager of level 40 experience and level 15 is the level 40 manager knows how to manipulate the game a bit better over a season but on any given match day , with even teams then there would be no difference between the two as far as team setup and tactics are concerned to be honest and they would be just as "polished".

    I like the idea of a tournament such as this but I very much dislike the elitist attitude and disrespect to those on a lower level than himself that this guy shows. I find the notion quite offensive however I guess he is allowed his opinion.
    Last edited by John Grant; 03-16-2018 at 12:36 PM. Reason: correction
    madflo19 likes this.

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by John Grant View Post
    To answer this properly and as it should be answered would probably get me a ban for not respecting other peoples opinion.

    I will say this though.............. no I better not.................stuff it I will say it .............. do you seriously think that a manager under level 40 would not know what to do on match day because he hasnt got enough experience ? The only real difference between a manager of level 40 experience and level 15 is the level 40 manager knows how to manipulate the game a bit better over a season but on any given match day , with even teams then there would be no difference between the two as far as team setup and tactics are concerned to be honest and they would be just as "polished".

    I like the idea of a tournament such as this but I very much dislike the elitist attitude and disrespect to those on a lower level than himself that this guy shows. I find the notion quite offensive however I guess he is allowed his opinion.
    yeah, okay i understand what you say but... Even if it is an elitiest attitude, I still think my thoughts are right. I think that world championship must be respected "top level's battle" because it is "contest", and "competition to the world champion." The world champion is, you know, the best of this match of around the world. and most game contests are also the same.


    I will say one more time, level 40 is only my think about the qualified the world championship. more lower, i don't care. but it must have a attitude the world championship.
    Last edited by blueflamedevil; 03-27-2018 at 01:35 AM.