Improving the statistics table

[nikolgiorgos]

I believe there must be some work from the programmers about the statistics table.

What I mean is that we all know that some times in real football is not the winner team the one which playing better in a game.
But this is happening very few times.
In T11 (my personal experience but reading other posts too), in most of the games where I loose or get a draw, the ball possession is 65-35 or something like this.
It becomes unrealistic and the game looks too random sometimes.
At some part, the efficiency must have some logic relation with b.p.
or the game procedure must calculate with a different way the b.p. giving less numbers.

From the Cup game I had today.


It's not that I lost (and disqualified after a 2-2 away, or that oppo manager wasn't present in both games or I had better q, or he played with 10 players from 75' blah blah blah)
please focus to the point that in the majority of lost games (like this) the b.p. is a 65-35 or similar.
I could post 10 stats tables like this but it's boring I guess.
Managers of the game understand what I mean.
Thanks


* I 'm not sure if this a suggestion or a bug of the game, so I posted it here.

[HairDryer]

agree. the statistic is unrealistic i think the is one issue need improvement. it make no sense sometimes.

[k1tb]

Too many "park the bus" results. Even the opponent team is playing with 3 defenders or 4.... I could understand if opponent is playing 5 defenders + dmc or something like that...but cmon...

[nikolgiorgos]

It was a long time that the vent thread was very quite but this season something happened.
And it's different when you see that the b.p. was against you or equal
you had less shots (or about the same) .
In that case you think, ok, it was a bad day, a bad form of some players, a wrong choice of formation, whatever.

But it's unrealistic to have so many bad results with a 65% - 35% b.p.

[madflo19]

Round of 16 champions league, playing against an opponent 1lvl lower and about 40% less quality than my team


Quarter finals champions league again my opponent was 1lvl below and about 35% less quality




Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[nash123]

(we are black)

-) both games were against the same formation and I used against both same formation and tactic.
-) both games were after FA game, so my team was full rested and moraled
-) both games were homeleg


Only difference: 1. stats were against a 15% stronger team, managed - won 2:0
2.stats were against a 53% weaker team, inactive - won 2:1

[HairDryer]

playing with a manage team will somehow give a balance and realistic stat. playing against an inactive team is like playing against half the strenght of mour team unbalance with unrealistic stat.

[nash123]

I think, you are absolutly right...

I'm black (home), 25% stronger and opponent wasn't there...
My keeper conceeded this season only 8 goals before that game... so, for sure, today he thought "I don't want to win CL, I do nothing"...




troll at it's best...

[nikolgiorgos]

I don't think it's the GK issue this season (as I mentioned about 3 seasons ago, with sudden super GKs).
I believe efficiency is the "weak" point.

[nash123]

I don't agree... I saw this season many saves, 5 and more. My keeper also saved a lot... it's how I said: we conceeded before this game 8 goals... and now he made not a single save?
vs 25% weaker team?
Opponent manager wasn't there?
I beat this guy twice in league, he plays since ~5 season everytime the same formation. He used excatly same player as he used in league.
At league, we won both games without conceeding...

that's only a troll result.