Bring back DML/DMR positions or something similar? (My opinion)

[tomu741]

When they removed dml/dmr they said that they combined both dl/dr and dml/dmr. So they are right. Just divide fullbacks square in the half - and you will have dl in first half and dml in second.
Same goes to aml/amr. Divide his zone and you get aml/amr and your lst/rst.
Not sure about other positions but those two for sure changes players position/movement in the game

[Aris Vardakas]

When they removed dml/dmr they said that they combined both dl/dr and dml/dmr. So they are right. Just divide fullbacks square in the half - and you will have dl in first half and dml in second.
Same goes to aml/amr. Divide his zone and you get aml/amr and your lst/rst.
Not sure about other positions but those two for sure changes players position/movement in the game

I know how it works mate but I do not get why I should have a defending (green player) in my midfield while I have a DMC (yellow player) also in my midfield.
Either make it equal or remove DMC as well and forward DC in his place.

Also, about AML/AMR as you say, it makes no sense for a midfield to play in the same line as ST, those players are attacking midfield wingers not strikers.

Do you want to see a difference of why old DML/DMR are not combined into current DL/DR?
They removed their SA like dribblers, playmakers they used to have.
To have such SA nowdays you need to also have ML/MR positions and still they will have no real effect.
(DMC can still use playmaker).
I know that it is not a big deal, to have such SAs, but if they "combined" them as you say, they should still be able to learn those.