Results 1 to 10 of 29
Like Tree26Likes

Thread: DFC (Dutch team)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Dreamer
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    347
    Thanks, but I'm actually pretty happy with 4-3-2W-1 at the moment. I know how to play it and I know I can beat stronger opponents when playing it (sometimes using def/counter). Logic says you need a DMC when you're opponent is playing with an AMC. Experience taught me it really doesn't make that much of a difference. I don't do worse against AMC formations.

    I used to play 4-5-1V, but I like the little more offensive style and the stronger midfield of 4-3-2W-1. I did try 4-2-2-2 hex in the past, but it doesn't suit me. I guess it's a little too offensive for my style of play.


    Just to be curious (and because there's always something more to learn): what observation made you to believe I would be better off changing formation?
    Nick Lizas likes this.

  2. #2
    VIP Nick Lizas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,375
    Quote Originally Posted by Duncton View Post
    Thanks, but I'm actually pretty happy with 4-3-2W-1 at the moment. I know how to play it and I know I can beat stronger opponents when playing it (sometimes using def/counter). Logic says you need a DMC when you're opponent is playing with an AMC. Experience taught me it really doesn't make that much of a difference. I don't do worse against AMC formations.

    I used to play 4-5-1V, but I like the little more offensive style and the stronger midfield of 4-3-2W-1. I did try 4-2-2-2 hex in the past, but it doesn't suit me. I guess it's a little too offensive for my style of play.


    Just to be curious (and because there's always something more to learn): what observation made you to believe I would be better off changing formation?
    i think your formation is very good if your opponets threre low quality if you play vs stronger or equal is no so good
    I guess that you are low level 14or15 when you reach higher levels you will see how much difficult is
    Duncton likes this.

  3. #3
    Newbie rehan14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Saigon, Vietnam
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by Duncton View Post
    Thanks, but I'm actually pretty happy with 4-3-2W-1 at the moment. I know how to play it and I know I can beat stronger opponents when playing it (sometimes using def/counter). Logic says you need a DMC when you're opponent is playing with an AMC. Experience taught me it really doesn't make that much of a difference. I don't do worse against AMC formations.

    I used to play 4-5-1V, but I like the little more offensive style and the stronger midfield of 4-3-2W-1. I did try 4-2-2-2 hex in the past, but it doesn't suit me. I guess it's a little too offensive for my style of play.


    Just to be curious (and because there's always something more to learn): what observation made you to believe I would be better off changing formation?
    I base it more on the amount of times you have won the league... 4 times is quite average considering the quality you have and the amount of game time you have had...

    so, perhaps get some CDM's to protect the defenders,, Particularly when you face tougher opponents, where the midfield battle pretty much decides the result
    Duncton likes this.
    twitter: rehan_gunner

    skype: rehanq84