Why do I lose with 70% possession and twice as good players?

[tongly45]

Here's statistics ratings and formations. All my players had 85% condition or more.

no probleme with formation (except you attack both flanks but i think you didn't). Hard attacking cause problem but quality distance is too grand. only unlucky cause you a lost in this situation.

[Lukas Martinsson]

Okay so I skip the hard attacking and go for attacking. And I should attack down both flanks? I've always set it to through the middle since it's where I've got my players, haha

[tongly45]

Okay so I skip the hard attacking and go for attacking. And I should attack down both flanks? I've always set it to through the middle since it's where I've got my players, haha

set through the middle. you have 0 player in flank

[herdo]

set through the middle. you have 0 player in flank

Are you ****ting me? He has all his players in the middle of the park and your saying attack through the flanks lol. Lukas, mate you attack through the middle when using narrow diamond.

Sometimes you lose to teams a lot worse than you, for no apparent reason, don't dwell on it or try to figure out where you went wrong. 9 times out of ten, with you Q difference alone youd have beaten him easily

[tongly45]

Are you ****ting me? He has all his players in the middle of the park and your saying attack through the flanks lol. Lukas, mate you attack through the middle when using narrow diamond.

Sometimes you lose to teams a lot worse than you, for no apparent reason, don't dwell on it or try to figure out where you went wrong. 9 times out of ten, with you Q difference alone youd have beaten him easily

i said that in general he has no problem with his formation, the only thing may cause him a formation problem is attack in flanks which i also though he didn't do? why the 2 guys think the same way? my english is awful, may be?

no probleme with formation (except you attack both flanks but i think you didn't). Hard attacking cause problem but quality distance is too grand. only unlucky cause you a lost in this situation.

AMfoulmouthbiotch: that 's the reason i wrote "may be". when you lost to a far weaker opponent, there are some commun reason that you not even notice them(for exemple once i started with 451V but when i make a sub for CM, somehow i dropped him as RM and play 30 minutes with illegal formation without know it)

[foulmouthbiotch]

i said that in general he has no problem with his formation, the only thing may cause him a formation problem is attack in flanks which i also though he didn't do? why the 2 guys think the same way? my english is awful, may be?



AMfoulmouthbiotch: that 's the reason i wrote "may be". when you lost to a far weaker opponent, there are some commun reason that you not even notice them(for exemple once i started with 451V but when i make a sub for CM, somehow i dropped him as RM and play 30 minutes with illegal formation without know it)

the problem was with the formation. I have seen ndiamond lose to 4-4-2 a few times already this season. a weaker apponent can beat you if they have the proper formation and tactics apparently. you cant argue this because there is proof that it happens in this thread and many others.

so the choices for him losing are his formation, the game engine, or luck. combo fo all three seems appropriate