wtf i now entered 10th season and first 4 games all used the cheat that gave them 80-20 possesion whats the point still playing the game i wonder :/
Printable View
wtf i now entered 10th season and first 4 games all used the cheat that gave them 80-20 possesion whats the point still playing the game i wonder :/
80-20 is not a cheat. It means the used of an illegal.
Can u put a picture of ur formation?
You're a lvl 10 manager and still you can't figure out that your playing/using Illegal formation?! http://www.smileyvault.com/albums/us...2/hit_head.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by mortician
I just saw his old post 4 months ago he posted something similar about a team cheating with 80-20 possession.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ljepoje
so what u mean if i got my players placed somehow in the field that makes ball possesion 80-20?
if thats the point which formations are illegal?i used 3 on centre od def one dmc on centre 3 mc on centre one amc and 2 st left and right is this illegal?
YesQuote:
Originally Posted by mortician
http://forum.topeleven.com/formation...ion-rules.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by mortician
So you use 3N-1-3N-1-2? It looks like a very slim formation. You know, no wings.
I never saw this formation before. I don't know if this formation is illegal, but I think it's quite easy to beat. :/
So probably: illegal!
Could you please help a nerd?!?
wtf does that mean? the programmers gave the mf cheaters an opportunity??
I´ve watched a few games the last days, and I couldn´t believe it. Seems like the easiest thing is to buy only trash, the weakest players you could find. You´ll win everything. And then I wondered about this stupid formation... is this the point?
please somebody explain that.
Attachment 11573
it is legal as a 7 euro paper-moneyQuote:
Originally Posted by mortician
You need some wingers my good man.
It's not illegal. AT least 3 def, check - at least 2 mid, check, doesn't have wingers, so doesn't have more than 2 W either side .. Just easy for opposition to play down the flanks against.
Goalkeeper (Must be player's natural position i.e. a GK) **
Some combination of at least 3 defenders (i.e. 3 players anywhere in the back row )
At least 1, but no more than 2, players on EACH outside flank. {the D(L/R), DM(L/R), M(L/R), AM(L/R) slots}
at least 3 midfielders (DM*, M*, AM*) at least one of which has to be an DM* or M*
At least 4 players on the opponents side of the pitch.
at least 1 Striker
At least 1, but no more than 2 players on each side. He has none, makes it illegal.
Ah! So you have to have at least one wing player, either in def or mid?
You have to have a pair of wingers either in defence or midfield. So for e.g DR, DL, MR, ML or just ML, MR or DL, DR.
It becomes illegal if you only have wingers on one side of if you have 3 wingers on one or both sides.
It´s illegal... ja ja.
Could you please explain why this is illegal. What happens if... Does that cause that my teamstrength goes down to zero?
And how could it be that I´m losing matches although my team is much stronger?
That's how Nordeus made it. In real life, you'd probably get a disadvantage with those formations too. Don't ask for any explanation beyond that. Just make sure that you have a legal formation.
It just gives the other team 80% possession. It is possible to win with an illegal formation, I've seen it happen before. But still has to be the right formation, and the right orders, against your opponent. This type of formation would just be too easy to counter, and playing down the flanks would certainly allow a lot of goals, specially with 80% possession...Quote:
Originally Posted by dgpunkt
This. The fact that only forum visitors know about the silly concept of illegal formations is quite unfair to the other 95% of players. Makes me wonder how many players Nordeus has lost due to players not knowing about it and getting frustrated. They should get rid of it or include warnings in the game when people set their formations.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamaraw
Id like to know how? (as Jay remarked above) You can even have a illegal formation...Surly its all managers prerogative to set up his side anyway he likes.. The only illegal side should be one that doesn't play a goalkeeper. Any other formation as set out by the manager is legal by definition...And having researched this a bit. There is no known illegal formations as far as the Laws of the game are concerned...Taken from the official rules of the game. "Each team consists of a maximum of eleven players (excluding substitutes), one of whom must be the goalkeeper. Competition rules may state a minimum number of players required to constitute a team, which is usually seven. Goalkeepers are the only players allowed to play the ball with their hands or arms, provided they do so within the penalty area in front of their own goal. Though there are a variety of positions in which the outfield (non-goalkeeper) players are strategically placed by a coach, these positions are not defined or required by the Laws"
As far as the above rules are concerned its not really a topic for discussion or at least shouldn't be.. Nordeus have simply for some reason be known only to themselves. Have rewritten the rules of the game to suit there own agenda...I am actually surprised there is not some sort of token penalty attached for playing what they, and only they, deem an illegal formation.
I have no input as to what is actually an illegal set-up.. Except that i have been very successful to this point (season six) and i have always played at least 2 wingers and try to always play 4 at the back.. Either as a flat back 4 or as 3N with a DMC. The only exception to this, is one rare occasions ill play with wing backs or full backs with AMR-AML in front of them with a single MC..As far as i am aware i have never had 20% possession in any game and after 5 full seasons i have only lost 9 league matches in total...
As much as I give out about Nord, and some aspects of the game, that's just complete and utter nonsense. You're talking as if this 95% of players wouldn't know a strange formation unless they came here?? I didn't know about this illegal formation thing until very recently - and guess what? I've never used one anyway, because I know at least a little about football. And I can't think of one club, ever, who used one of these "illegal" formations - not regularly at least. I reckon any team who would, would be getting thrashed repeatedly, that explains the penalty.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maranwe
If they didn't have some ruling on it, you'd be facing ridiculous formations from troll sides.
And I'd be willing to bet, a lot, that that 99% of that "95%" makey up number of people who can't use search to find this forum - for a game they are playing - do not use such silly formations.
Yep. I think that with the link to the forum being on the game page, and the wiki, would help anyone who really is curious about these "illegal" formations. Mostly, they are just stupid formations, and if you watch the game or look at the stats, the possession/shots should tell you that your form blew. but...
I really would like to play 2 dc with 3dmc. ;) And maybe no striker....
If they can't even bother checking forums for problems, they probably shouldn't play anyway.
