Season 45

[July Fourth]

Now... I'm really getting fed up of this team...



This is what you call... TROLLOCKS

[HateMeNow]

Now... I'm really getting fed up of this team...



This is what you call... TROLLOCKS

But it was 11 vs 10 for all the second half. Since when you forgot to never use all subs before last minutes? Surely a troll result in the first half, but i do think you went on overconfidence this time and that costed you.

Still i m positie you ll roflstomp him in your home leg

EDIT: so far the 3n-2w-2n-2w-1 alwais dominated the 4-4-2 flat in this season, when i faced it both on NT and PS sides.

[July Fourth]

But it was 11 vs 10 for all the second half. Since when you forgot to never use all subs before last minutes? Surely a troll result in the first half, but i do think you went on overconfidence this time and that costed you.

Still i m positie you ll roflstomp him in your home leg

EDIT: so far the 3n-2w-2n-2w-1 alwais dominated the 4-4-2 flat in this season, when i faced it both on NT and PS sides.

The WM? I think I can play that formation with the players I've got.

[HateMeNow]

The WM? I think I can play that formation with the players I've got.

Isnt the butterfly? 3dc,dmr dml 2mc 2amr/l 1 st

Counting the ND those modules brang out an overwhelming possession and pressure vs the 4-4-2 flat. Talking about cup opponents on par Q.

[dv8r]

Isnt the butterfly? 3dc,dmr dml 2mc 2amr/l 1 st

Counting the ND those modules brang out an overwhelming possession and pressure vs the 4-4-2 flat. Talking about cup opponents on par Q.

I don't think the butterfly is that good against the 4-4-2. I've lost CUP and CL ties using the butterfly against strong 4-4-2 teams.. I have lost the trust in that formation altogether. But what I have found is that the 4-1-4-1 and 4-5-1 flat tends to do a bit better

[kebess]

I have lost the trust in that formation altogether. But what I have found is that the 4-1-4-1 and 4-5-1 flat tends to do a bit better

Aye, indeed.

[HateMeNow]

I don't think the butterfly is that good against the 4-4-2. I've lost CUP and CL ties using the butterfly against strong 4-4-2 teams.. I have lost the trust in that formation altogether. But what I have found is that the 4-1-4-1 and 4-5-1 flat tends to do a bit better

That's the opposite of my tasting. How do you plaied it?

[kebess]

That's the opposite of my tasting. How do you plaied it?

4-5-1 is pretty nice against 4-4-2. When I play it, I use normal ment., mixed passing, mixed passes, no trap, no CA. Red arrows on ML/MR/MC (middle). It has never failed me.

But, 4-4-1-1 isn't bad neither, the AMC often makes the difference.

[dv8r]

That's the opposite of my tasting. How do you plaied it?

How do I play the 4-1-4-1?

Attacking mentality, mixed passing, own half pressing, mixed passing, hard tackle, zonal marking, no counter, no offside. Red arrows on ML/MR and ST.

[dv8r]

Champions League last 16, 1st leg

I.T.M. 0-4 Perfect Tactics

I.T.M.: 74.0, 3N-6-1v | Perfect Tactics: 83.6, 3W-5-2v

This is pretty much tie over. A big win against I.T.M. means we don't have to worry about the 2nd leg. It was plain sailing for us from the start, Rendon grabbing the first goal from Dickson's pass. Our opponents were getting some of the ball but it was nothing for our defence and we blocked and tackled everything they threw at us. Suparman was booked for a foul and Weber forced a save out of Pereira. Minutes later, Weber was booked for a foul and Suparman scored following the free kick. In the 2nd half, we continued to mount pressure on I.T.M. and Shlimazl went through on goal to give us a 3 goal lead. We were not there as Dickson registered another assist and set up Van der Zande from a corner

Goals: Rendon (7'), Suparman (41'), Shlimazl (51'), Van der Zande (61')
MOTM: Rendon