Lost against weaker team

[Dman2pt]

He was playing defense, with counter, and His have total control of the midfield. Whend he atacks he have 2ST, the 2 DM have red arrows for sure, and can even atack with 2 MC that have no direct marker, so he becames 6 against 4 of your players.

[CarlTaut]

He was playing defense, with counter, and His have total control of the midfield. Whend he atacks he have 2ST, the 2 DM have red arrows for sure, and can even atack with 2 MC that have no direct marker, so he becames 6 against 4 of your players.

LOL, how can you know how his opponent was playing? plus, i bet you are in lower lvls to say these things.

[Dman2pt]

LOL, how can you know how his opponent was playing? plus, i bet you are in lower lvls to say these things.

Why lol?
If he was not playing defense, how do you explain only 39% of possession, since he have total control of the midfield, with 5 against 3. The 13% bonus possession, do not represent really 13%.

My maine Team is now level 4 and have another on level 3.
I still need to learn a lot more, but this game it is only math, the only problem is that we simply do not know the formulas, to make the calculations.

[CarlTaut]

Why lol?
If he was not playing defense, how do you explain only 39% of possession, since he have total control of the midfield, with 5 against 3. The 13% bonus possession, do not represent really 13%.

My maine Team is now level 4 and have another on level 3.
I still need to learn a lot more, but this game it is only math, the only problem is that we simply do not know the formulas, to make the calculations.

the fact that his opp had 39% doesnt mean he was playing defensive... that team, from what i can see, looks like an inactive one. Low morale maybe the cause of his low possession. Anyway i can be right and you wrong, or viceversa... Doesnt matter at all because you hit the point: No one knows how the engine works. I dont know, you dont know. That's why your post was inappropriate. Anyway from my experience i can say there's not a single proof that can confirm that counter formations work..

[herdo]

the fact that his opp had 39% doesnt mean he was playing defensive... that team, from what i can see, looks like an inactive one. Low morale maybe the cause of his low possession. Anyway i can be right and you wrong, or viceversa... Doesnt matter at all because you hit the point: No one knows how the engine works. I dont know, you dont know. That's why your post was inappropriate. Anyway from my experience i can say there's not a single proof that can confirm that counter formations work..

How does it look inactive? You also reckon the formation countering his was just by chance or luck? Your a fine one to slate people for assuming things about tactics when they don't know, then you go n do the same thing haha!

[CarlTaut]

How does it look inactive?

It's a 2/3* star team. in lvl2 it's easy to buy players... looks like someone that entered the game some days before in lvl1 and didnt touch anything. Anyway, how i wrote, im not sure about that.... it was just to show that he couldnt be sure that that team played defensive.

You also reckon the formation countering his was just by chance or luck? Your a fine one to slate people for assuming things about tactics when they don't know, then you go n do the same thing haha!

i dont understand the question. what i said wrong? "No one knows how the engine works. I dont know, you dont know. From my experience i can say there's not a single proof that can confirm that counter formations work..". what exactly i assumed about tactics? did i say there are proof that other formations are working? No. i said that there arent proof that counter formations are working. i dont assume anything, it's the pure TRUTH. if you have proof about that show me please ;D