Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
Like Tree10Likes

Thread: Friendlies

  1. #11
    Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Johannesburg, SA
    Posts
    783
    Quote Originally Posted by rastaman70 View Post
    why is the term asymmetrical used?
    Cause it's one sided, unbalanced.
    The initiator, benefits from the boosters and skill points and the challenged team gets nothing, nor loses stamina.

  2. #12
    Pro littledude072's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Hiigara
    Posts
    929
    agreed, sounds terrible. i prefer
    'practice match 2.0 beta, now with bonuses!'
    DiZZee and Cat Harrison like this.
    take my posts with a sack of salt
    Click here to buy your sack of salt! Buy one get a ***load!, free! Free shipping and handling on and off planet!

    i am the fonz | je suis le fonz | saya adalah sang fonz
    fluent with these languages and can understand 3 more
    Click here to learn a new language, absolutely free!

    The inbeatable, indefeated, unvincible duet - Goonskies - Rags to Riches!
    kudos to cat

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by DiZZee View Post
    Cause it's one sided, unbalanced.
    The initiator, benefits from the boosters and skill points and the challenged team gets nothing, nor loses stamina.
    still, asymmetrical is the wrong word to use. this is not a question of balance between sides, as the benefits are not the same for both teams. and there is no symmetry because there are no shapes involved.

    the word that is closest to what should be used is FAIR. unfair friendlies, not assymetrical. this is just as stupid as using banking instead of tanking.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12