Possession

[Alexander Gomes]

Just explain me the question of "wide players"... Why the hell i cant play with the formation that i want? For me thats a big bug on this game, and this does NOT represent the sport neither the time expended playing the game and seeing games for possession... For sure there were modifications in the engine game cause they are beeing reporting lots of bugs and situations that are uncomun and unfairs....

[John Naish]

Just explain me the question of "wide players"... Why the hell i cant play with the formation that i want? For me thats a big bug on this game, and this does NOT represent the sport neither the time expended playing the game and seeing games for possession... For sure there were modifications in the engine game cause they are beeing reporting lots of bugs and situations that are uncomun and unfairs....

Well even if there wasn't a penalty for playing with no "wide players" - DL/R, DML/R, ML/R, and AML/R - you would be leaving yourself very open to attacks down the flanks, so it's not a good formation to play anyway - it is very easy for your opponents to exploit to their best advantage.

[Buffs Mad]

Just explain me the question of "wide players"... Why the hell i cant play with the formation that i want? For me thats a big bug on this game, and this does NOT represent the sport neither the time expended playing the game and seeing games for possession... For sure there were modifications in the engine game cause they are beeing reporting lots of bugs and situations that are uncomun and unfairs....

Its not rl with free will. Its a game and a game needs structure. It could be that the game engine produces extreme results when faced with extreme formations - where huge advantages are present without the natural diadvantages. Devs decided some controls were needed - you have that information.