I have been saving my money and not spending much on my player acquisitions. This has worked well so far. I may wait until the leagues start getting a little more challenging (actually see live players) until I start spending. Based on reading the forum it may be another couple seasons.
However when I am looking to make my first big purchase, I had thought buying the most expensive goalie I can afford would be a good idea. This one position seems like it could have the largest impact on my games and spending all my money on him would help me have a goalie that is young and a fast trainer and would be on my team for many seasons. But then I read forum posts that indicate more frustration with goalie prospects not living up to expectations more than other positions. Then it seems to evolve into a conservation into form vs quality vs "actual game performance" (actual saves vs goals given up).
1. Do you and should I place more value on the goalie position than the others?
2. Do they fail more often or are their failures just more visible because the you notice the opposing goals scored more than a lack of individual's goals?
3. I know this seems like a topic that has been debated thoroughly with no resolution (so I half apologize in advance and just ignore this if you must), but what do you value in a player? Quality? Value? Form? Actual stats? I know everything would be ideal, but it seems like small picture (just taking the current season into consideration) maybe form and actual stats are more important and that for large picture (next five or more seasons) quality and value are more important?