Hi there,
in my next match I will be using a formation with only 1 striker . My team possess 2 very good strikers (5*) and my MC's are 4* and 3*. My question is , would you place a very good striker on MC position to substitute 3* player ? thx
Hi there,
in my next match I will be using a formation with only 1 striker . My team possess 2 very good strikers (5*) and my MC's are 4* and 3*. My question is , would you place a very good striker on MC position to substitute 3* player ? thx
obviously, no
No, I wouldn't, you will lose possession 5% at least, and depending on the player he will mostly like suck at that position!
ST <=> AMs
AMs <=> MCs
MCs <=> DMs
Dms <=> Ds
Maybes' ?
xL <=> xC <=> cR again a good maybe they will perform?
ST<=/=>Ms is a no! There will be exceptions, I am talking about the general rule, your ST will more than likely do a 7 or less!
Toss up between correct counter formation with players out of position, or bad counter with people in the right places, depends on your opponent really?
In football it is better to be Lucky than Good.
Last edited by Peter Renn; 08-09-2014 at 10:40 AM.
yes but he can put a player in this position cause they as offensive minded player should perform ok
As an mc with red arrows is like a amc which is like striker so i think if the quality ok no problem if just for a game..
A defender as amc would suck probably but offensive minded player u can exchange i think...
Last edited by Peter Renn; 08-09-2014 at 10:35 AM.
I agree, in a friendly try first cause probably not every st could play a decent mc haha, i tried once a dmc plays mc, was a disaster, cause i think (don't know) defense minded player can play every defensive position and offensive minded player the other way around, but i can't see a dc gives a striker haha. Noone would train a striker as dc but u see people train the mc striker cause makes sense probably cause of attacking skills already exist, so for a game might work (never tried)
Don't do it..U will regret very very much...