View Poll Results: Shorter season in Top Eleven?

Voters
210. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    40 19.05%
  • No

    170 80.95%
Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 102
Like Tree107Likes

Thread: New duration of Top Eleven season? Yes or no? [Feedback]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Rookie Valentin Oprea's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania, Romania
    Posts
    108
    No, and i think this change if implemented will surely backfire for you Nordeus.Want quick money?Make the game more logical, at least half time ratings (increased half time break) and more conclusive comments to know whats going wrong with our teams in live matches with specific comments for each player or at least for defence/midfielders/attackers, something like "today the midfielders are in good shape passing superbly or "today midfielders are having a bad day" to know what exacly doesnt work.
    gazza and Cat Harrison like this.

  2. #2
    Famous tongly45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,378
    No for 2weeks season
    it take too much time in game
    -Europa league for 5th to 7th team,
    There will be 24 teams, 6 groupe in this competition. It start the same time as champions league and champions league 3rd in group could join them in knock out. OF COURSE prize money must be 1/2 of champions league
    Awards
    trainning points award 5-15 pts for the top scorers, passer and MVP
    make most valuable player more sense (only players has 10 matches can be count in)
    Cat Harrison likes this.
    Palaiseau FC in Sever 46
    season 28, level 28

    competition Played 1st 2nd top4 last win current season(*)
    League 28 19 6 2 season 27 .....
    Champions league 26 7 1 6 season 25 ........
    Cup 26 2 2 3 season 7 .......
    (*) updated at 1-June-2015

  3. #3
    Grand Master PricopGeorgeCătălin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    12,976
    It sounds good and fun, but I don't think it's a good idea because we will get more injured players at the end of the day, plus will be quite hard to change your team every 2 weeks, you won't have so much time to save tokens, plus will be way more hard to sell and buy players.

    As an active player of this game, I would not enjoy this, for me is perfect how is now.
    Orlova FC - onForum - LIKE Orlova FC - onYoutube - SUBSCRIBE Orlova FC - onFacebook

  4. #4
    VIP spornybol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    EASTBOURNE
    Posts
    4,520
    so 2 games today and 4 injuries and now you ask us should we play 3/4 games a day, trust me i`m swearing bad language at this idea
    Cat Harrison and gazza like this.
    15 Titles
    10 Runner-up
    5 Champions league
    2 Runner-up
    4 Cups
    2 Runner-up
    1 Treble

  5. #5
    Moderator dave1311's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Northallerton, United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,948
    This is not a good idea at all. Address issues that have cropped up time and time again (I don't need to list these). 4 games a day is ridiculous for so many reasons. Why try to tinker with one thing that actually isn't broken ?? It's a no from me.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Cat Harrison likes this.
    ROMANBY VILLAGE FC (founded December 24th 2013)
    Level 139
    50 League
    8 Champions/Elite League
    4 Super League/Gold Cup
    12 Cup

    1 Super Cup

    Top Eleven Forum Moderator

  6. #6
    Famous
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,764
    I suggest providing reward for 'positive' achievements, e.g True fan, Gentleman, etc. And I don't object providing rewards for others like bully, bad habit, etc.

    I don't object providing reward for scorers, passers and MVP. But I don't like determining MVP with player rating, that I do not really understand. It will be crazy but funny to vote MVP by league managers. Certainly, it is not allowed to vote for own team's player. I hate some of the friends. So it is far. I will not automatically vote for it.

  7. #7
    VIP spornybol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    EASTBOURNE
    Posts
    4,520
    I would love to know who in their mind would vote yes ? my guess it`s not Mods ( who DON`T work for Nordeus ) after reading their comment`s But All the Admins that ( DO WORK pmsl for Nordeus ) have come out of woodwork too vote ??
    15 Titles
    10 Runner-up
    5 Champions league
    2 Runner-up
    4 Cups
    2 Runner-up
    1 Treble

  8. #8
    VIP July Fourth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    15,386
    Why don't they open new servers for any player that wishes to play the 2 week season format?
    *Retired From Top Eleven*

  9. #9
    Dreamer El Duderino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    403
    Quote Originally Posted by July Fourth View Post
    Why don't they open new servers for any player that wishes to play the 2 week season format?
    Talking from experience as a former online game server manager, this is the best option. On the game I was, we had a "speed" server where all time-related actions were devided by 2. People had accounts on both normal and speed server and it didn't impose the format on all the players.

    But hey, we're talking about Nordeus here, the company that would rather come up with a new season duration rather than take all the feedback from unhappy players aka customers and repair the numerous problems in their game engine.
    Still talking from experience, when you have a freemium game (a free game with purchase possibilities), you're supposed to be able to play the game and get through different stages without having to pay. The paying option should be here just to give you an advantage against other non-paying players. In your case, Nordeus, there are so many injuries and penalties induced by losing a game that players have to pay if they wish to play normally. That's not how it works....

    So, at the end of the day, they'll say !@#$ the poll, we are Nordeus, we've always done what we want, regardless of our users' opinion".


    Seriously guys, there are more important issues than trying to find out if shorter seasons is a good idea.
    Last edited by Cat Harrison; 10-28-2014 at 09:34 PM.

  10. #10
    Rookie Zan Barrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    130
    I guess from their perspective, if they make igt a two week season they get much more money and activity, but be realistic, it will change the game drastically. You will lose all active managers because we will lose control and it will be a BOT game.

    If money is the issue, and it always is, give us time and options to spend more. give us time (days off) call them training camp and we will spend our reds and greens on upgrading our team. Let us control the U21 training and give us the new graduates for free. We will spend the greens on U21 if you make U21 students regain shape faster and learn faster.

    Limit new market players and make us build them up from U21. Give us better scouts. We will spend the tokens.

    In short make it a real managers game. teach, train recruit and field. that is what we want.
    gazza and Cat Harrison like this.

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast