This is not a troll result !

Well, this isn’t a troll result.
My team is on the right, playing out for CH.L. yesterday.

Attachment 33158
Attachment 33159

My team was better in quality, the formation was proper, the players had superb morale and condition , except 1 who had a continuously 5, every other had over 6 in rates and I had the min win bonus. So it had to be me the winner (by logic). Both managers watching the game, I had 2 friends, the other one .
The game begun with 1-0 and suddenly in 57’ and 58’ min. two penalties and two red cards in a row. :eek:

But I think the troll thing isn’t in the result itself but the presentation of the game.

After or during the process of a match, the game making a presentation, a visualization of the game. The game must have a variety in the presentation of the matches because otherwise it would be boring to see every match finishing with scores like 1-0, 2-0, 1-1, 0-0 no goals/cards/injuries/heroic-tragic performances.
Sometimes fails in this presentation, like this one.
Of course the other manager would think that it was a troll result but actually it was a troll presentation. :p

Ps : impressive performance by his GK who saved 8 out of 11 shots but he still got only a 7.

I would say his formation is a decent counter against your formation

I'm not sure I understand how the OP's quality was better? Based on the players shown in the pictures, his starting lineup had a superior quality to your starting lineup . . . And I think @RJSlow is right that his formation could provide a decent counter to yours (prior to red cards).

agree with above myself if i was o/p team i would either go 4-1-2-1-2 and through middle but my preferred choice is 3-1-4 2 with going down flanks

The op team is on the RIGHT. I know it says left but look at the names.

during lot of time Ive said the same.. in the 11 vs 10 or 11 vs 9 this game have a big fail in the internal proggramming... the player (by my viewpoint) simply dissappear and the Q. that counts is of 9 players in place of 11... places covered by invisible players and here some various situations.... thats like a team of 11 vs one of football 7 LOL

Quote:

---

The op team is on the RIGHT. I know it says left but look at the names.

---

Yes , sorry you 're right. I 'm in the right place.

Well, I ‘m not so experienced but watching my games as other games so far I started believing that :

Possession : is considering the quality and condition of the players, presence of the managers, tickets, friends, formation, maybe home field or out, maybe win bonus and giving a balance. With that, we can’t be sure who ‘s gonna win the game, it’s like when a bookmaker gives % and bets for a team to win the match.
Total shots : the real process of the game. Considering less factors, like q, formation/orders, maybe form of the players. This is the first judgment . The team with more shots it’s usually the winner.
Shots on target-shots – shots efficiency : it’s the capability of the attackers against the defenders. Considering the q of the players, the form, maybe a special ability – meaning a ST with one-to-one against a GK with no sa has better chances against a ST with no sa, against a GK with o-t-o sa.
Passes completed : I don’t know how this thing is working.

Of course here, we have the “luck” factor, sometimes the program favors one team. A 4* team has good chances against a 5* team but sometimes the program can favor also 2* dif. quality (if we suppose that all other conditions are ok). With that it’s trying to keep the interest on the game and make a simulation of real football.

All these things are behind the curtain – the program and the process.
During and after that it’s what a manager can see. The visualization, the mask, the picture of the match. The game must give a variety of the progress of the match. Here comes (sometimes) the fails. Like the example I gave. By random process, the program presented 2 penalties & red cards in two minutes.

I'll sell that 5rated dmc immediately.
Can you post your orders?
Perfect orders for this game I think
Attacking; full pitch; hard tackle; short passing; without CA; with OT.

I started with def/mixed/half pitch/normal/mixed pass/zonal/counter blue arrow on the central DC, red arrows to wingers.
I had only 2-3 shots more, so the second half I subbed my DMC and changed the orders like yours except passing and hard tackle (it's CH.L. so I don't want to risk with cards in quarter or semi finals).

I have a problem with my DMC/DC. He was an agent/scout 2 seasons before, had two excellent seasons but this one he didn't start well. In the last match I used him as DC (which probably I keep). He got a 7. Also I will watch him when he 'll get the red star.

Attachment 33185