Should players' ranks be subjective?

[vad]

I wonder: the fact that the same player appears to other managers as "legend" or "good" depending on the level of the observer (i.e. he will be a legend for someone with much lower level, but "good" for someone with the same level, etc.)- is it by design? I'd think that should be absolute: legend is a legend, regardless of my own level.

[spornybol]

I don`t care what star shows on player it`s the quality of player that`s count, i could have a 1 star player that`s 5 star to 4 level below this tell me there 5 star player is same quality as my 1 star player, if team below my level shows 5 star same a mine then it tells me for that level below they are scout team

[Matteo de Clemente]

Stars only give an indication of how the quality of a player is compatible with the complexity of the level you are. So,for your level those players will be legend,for a +5 higher level they will be normal. Nothing strange.

Before a match,you have to compare the quality of your main team (the players you consider most performant),with the main team of your opponent.
Many managers may choose to have a 6 star main team,and a group of reserves with 1 or 2 stars.

[nikolgiorgos]

I don't care about that .
The only "annoying" thing is when I watch some games of friends from much higher levels, I cannot understand the quality.
I see a bunch of legends against other legends

[Gert Funck]

I don't care about that .
The only "annoying" thing is when I watch some games of friends from much higher levels, I cannot understand the quality.
I see a bunch of legends against other legends

The same thing for much lower teams, they all have only one star, no matter if they are level one or 10

[Cat Harrison]

Yeah I wish at least during a live match it was easier to compare the teams playing versus each other, rather than see them from our own level's perspective.