Printable View
Hi guys... would some one explain how red and blue arrow works and how its work with counterstrike also do I need more than one position of player to work perfect with arrow for example If my MR have red arrow do I need AMR position to give me best results.#thank in advance
Lack of answers might prove that no one knows.
"Slobodan, did you implement the code for arrows we discussed ?"
",yes Goran I did,"
"I cannot find the code"
" that is strange cause I am almost certain I implemented it"
"Our code is just messy nowadays, nobody knows what's in there anymore"
or the fact that it is asked every single week ? :rolleyes:
in the upper right corner, there is the search button.
But better go to advanced search.
Then you ll put - arrows- the key word for searching and only "in the titles".
Then you 'll have many interesting older posts about arrows, to read about.
I don't use MR & ML anymore, I prefer to have AMR & AML because they 're scoring a lot and they 're giving me victories when my STs cannot score - I give them red arrows.
I trust my DR & DL to confront opponent MR-AMR & ML-AML.
I give my defenders blue arrows and that's all.
* but that's my personal way of playing.
have my theory .. but is late tonight .. too tired to write it
but as many said .. is all guessing here
How I use them:
Red arrows - when player, usually winger, has open space in front of him (eg. when I have 4 wingers while opponent has only 2)
or when I choose defensive formation to force players to join attack.
Blue arrows - when I'm focused on defense or outnumbered in some part of pitch (eg. when I have 2MC+DMC in the middle while opponent has AMC+2MC+DMC, then I use blue arrows on MC's)
What he said :oQuote:
Originally Posted by t11_fan
I'd like to know why people use red arrows on strikers (ST) and wide attacking mildfielders (AML and AMR)?
I don't understand why should I put one of those on attacker, to force him to join attack? If he is in attack, why order him to join attack LOL?
Instead I'd suggest blue arrows on strikers for 3ST formations. If someone doesn't understand why, then I'll write Wayne Rooney, attacker who has great work rate.
So If you use such offensive 3ST formation, then you need 1-2 strikers to help in defensive (sth what Rooney does).
And reverse:
If you are playing some 5 defenders formation, then you could use red arrows on some of them, but be careful:
-When opponent uses AMR and AMR against your 5DEF formation, then do not use red arrows on fullbacks!
-When opponent has 3 offensive players in front of your defence (eg 3ST, 2AM+ST etc.), then do not use red arrows on DC's
Remember that there is no universal setup which is good, so that's why we can adjust our formation and tactics. That should improve our stats in matches.
Rooney has become an AMC ;)
It is hard to define now which position he plays LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Gert Funck
I've seen him cleaning balls in front of their goal, just like some centre back. Although I'm Liverpool fan, I have massive respect for that player. He maybe isn't in scorers form now, but he is very useful player.
True he is, but seems a bit over the hill. And has begun losing his head at crucial times (direct red)Quote:
Originally Posted by t11_fan
He still has the ability too take the game changing role
Sometimes you need Red arrows on strikers and aml amr amc. Look at their performances. If the Performance is Bad, a Red arrow can help to get better.
If your team dont make any pressure, a Red arrow can help!
Last week i played with 4-3-2w-1 against hexagon. My st only worked with a blue Arrow. Yes your hear right, a blue Arrow! He scored 2 goals!!!
Under my Text is a thread about 4-4-2, where I Show many orders for it. There you can See, that 1 st get a blue Arrow and the other 1 get a Red arrow. The st with blue Arrow will Fall back in the MF and receive some passes in counter attacks. And for pressing in a 4-4-2 one st will Fall in MF to get the ball with the Players in MF.
@minz90
I've never used red arrows on ST's and also never had problems with their performance. My experience says that main reason of bad performances usually lays in mildfield. Also I've solved them changing mostly MC's which seems to be magnet for bad form. Luckly there are plenty of them on auctions so it's easy to find replacement. If mildfield works, then mine attack also works. Strikers itself do not create problems for me, but I have to admit I'm not that dependent of them because of mildfielders-scorers. In my main team where I play base formation 352 for whole season my top and leagues top scorer is 4* MR.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gert Funck
Rooney is a deep lying forward... if that make any sense to anyone... I know I've seen such forward in some other leagues in modern footballQuote:
Originally Posted by t11_fan
That s not wrong what you say. I ve played 3-5-2 v too and i ve found out, that there are no arrows need. Maybe in rarely cases sometimes.Quote:
Originally Posted by t11_fan
I often play 4-2mc-3w-1, 4-4-1-1, 4-4-2 and 4-5-1 v. For those formation i need Red arrows for the attacking players.
I ve Noticed , my st are not anymore in the offside After setting some arrows or they can Dribble better. Sometimes blue arrows will allow them to play deeper (in MF like a amc) and save some balls.
What i never use, are blue arrows on my defenders. I think they get to many cards so that the opponent get freekicks.
I agree, red arrows on offensive player and blue on defensive player causes counter-effect.
Btw. I've today played 4-DMC-2W-2AMC-ST against weaker 2DC-DL-DMC-4-2.
What I've noticed during the match:
I've started with red arrow on ML, but during the match decided to put red arrows on fullbacks. BP increased immediately for 2%. That's probably because opponent had 3 wingers (me 4) and because his wings are weaker than mine.
Attachment 55230
my AML& AMR (with red arrows) are the players who 're giving my victories last seasons :p
what!Quote:
Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos
Attachment 55235
yes sometimes it is realy important to have offensive full-backs to save or increase Possession. In most cases i think about narrow formations like ND or 4-3-3. In real life it s very important. Very often they have to attack the flanks alone to cross the ball or to create an additional open man.
But in game we can observe what our full backs do. they will work in Possession without any arrow, but sometimes not enough. In those cases we can set a red arrow and they will help more in attack.
in my last post i forgot to say, i ve noticed that an attacker with red or blue arrow will score more often after Corners and freekicks. and we now such a Situation can decide a game ;)
I don't play any arrows.
Throughout 2 years its influence in final results has been 100% irrelevant.
It's cosmetic.
Yeah, I usually don't see a difference either but this season my CM is my best player with a red arrow and my full backs seem to stretch the wings with arrows and my AML, AMR with no arrows seem to tuck in and attack edge of area.Quote:
Originally Posted by Celtic
You'd need counterfactual events.
And even worse, since a small tree of fixed outcomes is calculated by RGN in the 3 minutes before game with an odds system, you can get different results with the same team and actions.
Actually it has happened in server crashes. There were people who won games here and upon server reset they lost the same game.
Meaning you'd need at least 10 repetition of each game with arrows and 10 games with no arrows, throughout many seasons.
