They are just generated /made up players like the scout players but younger & easier to train up.
What would ever make you think they came from a "real" team ?
& overall they are worth it![]()
They are just generated /made up players like the scout players but younger & easier to train up.
What would ever make you think they came from a "real" team ?
& overall they are worth it![]()
Last edited by Bunzo; 03-19-2016 at 11:29 AM.
But then, the statistics are fake and are probably not reliable. There are strong indications that they are fake; for instance, there is a trend in the ratio goals:assists, and in the number of yellow cards.
I have said that there is a possibility for the players to come from bot teams as some bot teams on the level of the current team I am managing, have 6-star players with special abilities.
Why do you think on overall, they are worth it?
Last edited by Tactician; 03-19-2016 at 11:59 AM.
quit this game (23/08/2015)
started playing again (13/03/2016)
quit this game (08/08/2016)
playing (11/12/2016)
quit this game (11/01/2017)
playing (May 2017)
quit this game (23/07/2017)
playing (22/07/2018)
quit this deceiving game (24/08/2018)
playing (02/09/2019)
Final Quit; Enough is Enough (10/12/2019)
They are worth it because any of them I have bought for my teams have turned out to be excellentThe one to buy is the 19 year old highest price
The problem is the variation of players recommended
quit this game (23/08/2015)
started playing again (13/03/2016)
quit this game (08/08/2016)
playing (11/12/2016)
quit this game (11/01/2017)
playing (May 2017)
quit this game (23/07/2017)
playing (22/07/2018)
quit this deceiving game (24/08/2018)
playing (02/09/2019)
Final Quit; Enough is Enough (10/12/2019)
On the whole, I've been pleased with my recommendation purchases, mainly players with ST role, as at the time that the recommended players were introduced, strikers were so cr*p at doing their job. I could see the machinations in Nordeus' mind - 'let's make STs useless then give the managers a way of getting good ones for more T'...
Palace Casuals have made more use of them, all the high-T (right-hand) players (in order of purchase):
On one occasion a purchase was made of the middle player, but although he played well the first season, he flopped in the next, so he was offloaded (thus confirming Bunzo's recommendation).
Palace Terriers have one (again the high-T (right-hand) player):
![]()
Last edited by talisman; 03-19-2016 at 01:14 PM.
Any formation or tactics advice given is based purely on experience with my teams...
Thanks for the feedback. It seems that their performances do drop after a season or two, despite being young players and fast trainers; a typical Nordeus tactic.
So far, not very convincing as you can still get close too, equally, and even better performing players from both the auction market and the scouts' list. The main advantages is not having to pay the transfer market value fee, and avoiding the hassle of keeping an eye on the transfer market very frequently for particular players.
Last edited by Tactician; 03-19-2016 at 01:46 PM.
quit this game (23/08/2015)
started playing again (13/03/2016)
quit this game (08/08/2016)
playing (11/12/2016)
quit this game (11/01/2017)
playing (May 2017)
quit this game (23/07/2017)
playing (22/07/2018)
quit this deceiving game (24/08/2018)
playing (02/09/2019)
Final Quit; Enough is Enough (10/12/2019)
Only if they're there and you can win an auction - at the time I was buying the first ones for Palace Casuals there was a dearth of suitable players in the market and the ones that did get there were subject to auction frenzy and went for ridiculous prices in very high round counts...
I've found that the performances actually increase, especially if you have three that play off each other, as Palace Casuals do.
Any formation or tactics advice given is based purely on experience with my teams...
Yes, that are the disadvantages. That are the risks of the transfer market. First, the right players must be listed (something that I had trouble with last year, and I had to make use of the scouts list), you must be there when they are listed, and you have to win the bids. The scouts and recommendation lists might be more convenient, but there is also the negociations' list.
If it was during the period when I was here last year, maybe I would have bought some of those recommended players. Such players, albeit tempting, don't fit in my plans now, as so far, from what I have seen, the ratio benefit:cost is poor when considering that you can achieve more or less the same in terms of winning competitions with cheaper alternatives (when I mean cheap, this means no power training included as this option turned out to be even more expensive). If 'free' earn-token offers were available in my region and I was able to earn enough tokens, may be I would have added a few recommendation players to my team. In my opinion, this new feature will provide something extra for users who intend or have to use the scouts' list.
Of course, for those users who have been generally satisfied with recommended players and can afford using a lot tokens per player, they may do so until they are no longer satisfied, can no longer afford them or no longer feel the need for them.
Last edited by Tactician; 03-20-2016 at 06:16 AM.
quit this game (23/08/2015)
started playing again (13/03/2016)
quit this game (08/08/2016)
playing (11/12/2016)
quit this game (11/01/2017)
playing (May 2017)
quit this game (23/07/2017)
playing (22/07/2018)
quit this deceiving game (24/08/2018)
playing (02/09/2019)
Final Quit; Enough is Enough (10/12/2019)
After 20 times in a row, my assistant propose me again 3 GK.
i bought one, i hope now that he don't propose me a GK ever again![]()
quit this game (23/08/2015)
started playing again (13/03/2016)
quit this game (08/08/2016)
playing (11/12/2016)
quit this game (11/01/2017)
playing (May 2017)
quit this game (23/07/2017)
playing (22/07/2018)
quit this deceiving game (24/08/2018)
playing (02/09/2019)
Final Quit; Enough is Enough (10/12/2019)