I am a level 14 manager, my entire team is 5* except for two 6* players and they are under-performing, why is that happening and should I sell them both and just get normal 5 star players? Please help asap!
Printable View
I am a level 14 manager, my entire team is 5* except for two 6* players and they are under-performing, why is that happening and should I sell them both and just get normal 5 star players? Please help asap!
No keep them, they will get better
Maybe you are not using them to there specific abilities ? It's more than just a number its strategy. I basically write down each players abilities stats and areas of strength. And find the best solution for each guy.
It's not fool proof there Is Always a team standing in front of you trying to shut down your plan. So it's trial and error
Don't give up on them =] Help them become better
Best wishes and I hope it works out
I guess you've bought them from the scouts. If so, big mistake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohamed Mujtaba
Sorry, no offence, but never say like that if you have 0 experience with player from scout list.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arion
Attachment 62270
Sorry. My fault.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Sjarifudin
On the other hand, trained scouts are more or less good. I've had them, Baert was one.
Why I don't recommend scouts is that if you really want good players look for them in negos. Offer 10T (therefore at the most 30T) and you have good odds of getting a young player just 1 SP off 6*. The old scouts are exactly 6* and cost 39T. Moreover, you don't know if they're good, while in negus you may bid on in-form players.
Scouts can cost a lot of Ts, I can build even a 22-man (tho 18 is enough for me) squad off 69T.
Scouts aren't for 35T managers like me and the majority of TE players.
No dont sell them i suggest you bench them for few matches and give them time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohamed Mujtaba
High quality players have a higher probability to contribute more, especially in matches against high quality teams. However, this is not guaranteed.
If the players are new, I will observe them and probably bench them for a while. If players never perform well for a long period, probably he will never fit tactics of the team. I will sell them even if their quality is high. BTW, I believe some players are less consistent. I will observe their performance pattern, so I keep a record of performance myself.
What do you mean by bad and from 5 to 6 now depends but the quality difference isn't that huge so is normal that some of the 5 stars to perform better, is not like you are comparing a 3 stars or a 4 stars with a 6 stars.
Another aspect now is that depends a lot on your opponents quality too. If you have strong opponents they might not perform super great.
My advice is to follow them, give them few games... At the time you made the post you could had only 1 official game so let them to play more. Friendly games are always tricky and is hard to make a personal opinion.
The player quality only matter when you have all that;
1: Superb morale
2: Nice formation
3: Balance between defense and attack.
4: Good manager
5: Nice average team quality.
Better answer, this one!
My team is 90% made from scouts and I compete for treble every year (ok, most times I fail...).
Scouts are like great wines.
You can get a very good wine for $ 20. If you want a fantastic wine, it will be $ 1000.
For sure, the fantastic wine is not worth 50 times the other one's price. But it's better (likely to be).
And that makes all the difference.
Wine quality also matters.Same wine of different quality is due to manufacture so problem is in manager not in players.
why we 're talking about scouts ?
he didn't tell us if his players are scouts or not :confused:
I was talking about quality and don't know others view anyways they thought 6 star means scout.
